TY - GEN
T1 - Stormwater treatment using upflow filters
AU - Pratap, M.
AU - Khambhammettu, U.
AU - Clark, S. E.
AU - Pitt, R.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - In this research, an upflow filtration system was developed, and its effectiveness was demonstrated. Five filtration media (lightweight sand, pool-filter sand, fine-grade sand, peat moss and compost were examined for solids removal ability in bench-scale tests. The objectives were to determine (1) the optimum flow rate (no separation of the media from the gravel or within the media, and where suspended solids removal was "best"); (2) the suspended solids loading that reduced the flow rate to certain end points; (3) the breakthrough point (i.e., where the effluent concentration equaled the influent concentration) for each media. The evaluation parameters were flow rate, and effluent turbidity, total solids and particle size distribution. Statistical comparisons of the filters demonstrated that the compost-sand and peat-sand performed better (had greater removals) for turbidity and total solids during the early to the intermediate part of the filter run when compared to sands. Late in the filter run, the peat-sand filter still produced significantly better effluent than the pool sand and the fine sand; however, solids washout from the compost-sand filter occurred and the compost-sand filter performed worse than the two sand filters. For the particle size distribution data, all media were statistically indistinguishable from each other. Copyright ASCE 2005.
AB - In this research, an upflow filtration system was developed, and its effectiveness was demonstrated. Five filtration media (lightweight sand, pool-filter sand, fine-grade sand, peat moss and compost were examined for solids removal ability in bench-scale tests. The objectives were to determine (1) the optimum flow rate (no separation of the media from the gravel or within the media, and where suspended solids removal was "best"); (2) the suspended solids loading that reduced the flow rate to certain end points; (3) the breakthrough point (i.e., where the effluent concentration equaled the influent concentration) for each media. The evaluation parameters were flow rate, and effluent turbidity, total solids and particle size distribution. Statistical comparisons of the filters demonstrated that the compost-sand and peat-sand performed better (had greater removals) for turbidity and total solids during the early to the intermediate part of the filter run when compared to sands. Late in the filter run, the peat-sand filter still produced significantly better effluent than the pool sand and the fine sand; however, solids washout from the compost-sand filter occurred and the compost-sand filter performed worse than the two sand filters. For the particle size distribution data, all media were statistically indistinguishable from each other. Copyright ASCE 2005.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37249038072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37249038072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/40792(173)227
DO - 10.1061/40792(173)227
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:37249038072
SN - 0784407924
SN - 9780784407929
T3 - World Water Congress 2005: Impacts of Global Climate Change - Proceedings of the 2005 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress
SP - 227
BT - World Water Congress 2005
T2 - 2005 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress
Y2 - 15 May 2005 through 19 May 2005
ER -