Abstract
Studies of human genetic diseases have suggested a higher mutation rate in males than in females and the male-to-female ratio (α) of mutation rate has been estimated from DNA sequence and microsatellite data to be about 4-6 in higher primates. Two recent studies, however, claim that α is only about 2 in humans. This is even smaller than the estimates (α > 4) for carnivores and birds; humans should have a higher α than carnivores and birds because of a longer generation time and a larger sex difference in the number of germ cell cycles. To resolve this issue, we sequenced a noncoding fragment on Y of about 10.4 kilobases (kb) and a homologous region on chromosome 3 in humans, greater apes, and lesser apes. Here we show that our estimate of α from the internal branches of the phylogeny is 5.25 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.44 to ∞), similar to the previous estimates, but significantly higher than the two recent ones. In contrast, for the external (short, species-specific) branches, α is only 2.23 (95% CI: 1.47-3.84). We suggest that closely related species are not suitable for estimating α, because of ancient polymorphism and other factors. Moreover, we provide an explanation for the small estimate of α in a previous study. Our study reinstates a high α in hominoids and supports the view that DNA replication errors are the primary source of germline mutation.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 624-626 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Nature |
| Volume | 416 |
| Issue number | 6881 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 11 2002 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Strong male-driven evolution of DNA sequences in humans and apes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver