Students' analysis of multiple sources for agreements and disagreements

Flori H. Manning; Susan R. Goldman; Yasuhiro Ozuru; Kimberly A. Lawless; Kimberley Gomez; Jason Braasch

Students' analysis of multiple sources for agreements and disagreements

Flori H. Manning, Susan R. Goldman, Yasuhiro Ozuru, Kimberly A. Lawless, Kimberley Gomez, Jason Braasch

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

Abstract

Students analyzed the similarities (agreements) and differences (disagreements) between a set of two sources regarding why the authors thought Chicago had become a big city. The data we discuss provide descriptive information on three aspects of students' responses: (1) the response strategies they used, (2) how they would characterize agreement and disagreement across two sources, and (3) the rhetorical form of their written responses. Students' responses for Agree were more consistent than those to Disagree and, as expected, were related to the specific sources they compared.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	19-26
Number of pages	8
Journal	Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL
Issue number	PART 2
State	Published - 2008
Event	International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World - 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2008 - Utrecht, Netherlands Duration: Jun 23 2008 → Jun 28 2008

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Human-Computer Interaction
Education

Cite this

@article{14f3c252982341269a06917119f6d414,

title = "Students' analysis of multiple sources for agreements and disagreements",

abstract = "Students analyzed the similarities (agreements) and differences (disagreements) between a set of two sources regarding why the authors thought Chicago had become a big city. The data we discuss provide descriptive information on three aspects of students' responses: (1) the response strategies they used, (2) how they would characterize agreement and disagreement across two sources, and (3) the rhetorical form of their written responses. Students' responses for Agree were more consistent than those to Disagree and, as expected, were related to the specific sources they compared.",

author = "Manning, {Flori H.} and Goldman, {Susan R.} and Yasuhiro Ozuru and Lawless, {Kimberly A.} and Kimberley Gomez and Jason Braasch",

year = "2008",

language = "English (US)",

pages = "19--26",

journal = "Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL",

issn = "1573-4552",

publisher = "International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS)",

number = "PART 2",

note = "International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World - 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2008 ; Conference date: 23-06-2008 Through 28-06-2008",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Students' analysis of multiple sources for agreements and disagreements

AU - Manning, Flori H.

AU - Goldman, Susan R.

AU - Ozuru, Yasuhiro

AU - Lawless, Kimberly A.

AU - Gomez, Kimberley

AU - Braasch, Jason

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Students analyzed the similarities (agreements) and differences (disagreements) between a set of two sources regarding why the authors thought Chicago had become a big city. The data we discuss provide descriptive information on three aspects of students' responses: (1) the response strategies they used, (2) how they would characterize agreement and disagreement across two sources, and (3) the rhetorical form of their written responses. Students' responses for Agree were more consistent than those to Disagree and, as expected, were related to the specific sources they compared.

AB - Students analyzed the similarities (agreements) and differences (disagreements) between a set of two sources regarding why the authors thought Chicago had become a big city. The data we discuss provide descriptive information on three aspects of students' responses: (1) the response strategies they used, (2) how they would characterize agreement and disagreement across two sources, and (3) the rhetorical form of their written responses. Students' responses for Agree were more consistent than those to Disagree and, as expected, were related to the specific sources they compared.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880448204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880448204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84880448204

SN - 1573-4552

SP - 19

EP - 26

JO - Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

JF - Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

IS - PART 2

T2 - International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World - 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2008

Y2 - 23 June 2008 through 28 June 2008

ER -

Students' analysis of multiple sources for agreements and disagreements

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this