Students’ epistemological resources and framing of stoichiometry assessment items across linguistic backgrounds: insights for equitable design

Keyphrases

• Stoichiometry 100%
• Multilingual Learners 100%
• Linguistic Background 100%
• Assessment Items 100%
• Epistemic Resources 100%
• Equitable Design 100%
• Epistemological Framing 100%
• Trans Linguistics 100%
• Conceptual Understanding 50%
• Resource Activation 50%
• Linguistic Complexity 50%
• Epistemic Dimension 25%
• First Language 25%
• Design Time 25%
• Assessment Design 25%
• Sensemaking 25%
• Hammer 25%
• Revised Version 25%
• Strategizing 25%
• Symbolic Representation 25%
• Chemistry Course 25%
• Language Background 25%
• Linguistic Features 25%
• Linguistic Resources 25%
• Classroom Language 25%
• Introductory Chemistry 25%
• Chemical Assessment 25%
• Time-aware 25%
• Semiotic Resources 25%
• English Monolinguals 25%
• Epistemological Stance 25%
• US Universities 25%
• Strategic Stance 25%
• Think-aloud Interviews 25%
• Science Assessment 25%
• Equity Assessment 25%
• Resources Framework 25%
• Procedural Representation 25%
• Emotional Stance 25%
• Epistemological Frames 25%
• Symbolic Notation 25%
• Item Design 25%

Arts and Humanities

• Linguistics 100%
• Framing 100%
• Multilingualism 83%
• Chemistry 50%
• Under-graduate 33%
• English 33%
• Linguistic Complexity 33%
• Monolingual 16%
• Engagement 16%
• Epistemic 16%
• Multi-modal 16%
• Sense making 16%
• Linguistic features 16%
• Think-aloud 16%
• Semiotics 16%
• US universities 16%
• Masking 16%

Social Sciences

• Linguistics 100%
• Framing 100%
• Multilingualism 83%
• English 33%
• Conceptual Understanding 33%
• USA 16%
• Linguistic Feature 16%
• Semiotics 16%