TY - JOUR
T1 - Studying organizational advocacy and influence
T2 - Reexamining interest group research
AU - Hojnacki, Marie
AU - Kimball, David C.
AU - Baumgartner, Frank R.
AU - Berry, Jeffrey M.
AU - Leech, Beth L.
PY - 2012/6/15
Y1 - 2012/6/15
N2 - In Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science (1998), Frank Baumgartner and Beth Leech characterized a series of problems in the interest group research published between 1950 and 1995. In this article, we assess whether recent research has become more theoretically coherent, more attentive to context, and broader in both scope and topical focus, all of which are crucial to advancing the systematic study of interest groups and their policy-making activities. Overall, we observe more large-scale and longitudinal studies between 1996 and 2011 than Baumgartner & Leech observed between 1950 and 1995. This newer literature also is much more likely to focus on key issues for students of politics, and to give attention to the context in which organizations operate to affect public policy. However, we see minimal evidence that scholars addressing similar questions within the subfield are operating from one or a few shared theoretical frameworks.
AB - In Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science (1998), Frank Baumgartner and Beth Leech characterized a series of problems in the interest group research published between 1950 and 1995. In this article, we assess whether recent research has become more theoretically coherent, more attentive to context, and broader in both scope and topical focus, all of which are crucial to advancing the systematic study of interest groups and their policy-making activities. Overall, we observe more large-scale and longitudinal studies between 1996 and 2011 than Baumgartner & Leech observed between 1950 and 1995. This newer literature also is much more likely to focus on key issues for students of politics, and to give attention to the context in which organizations operate to affect public policy. However, we see minimal evidence that scholars addressing similar questions within the subfield are operating from one or a few shared theoretical frameworks.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861434760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861434760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-polisci-070910-104051
DO - 10.1146/annurev-polisci-070910-104051
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84861434760
SN - 1094-2939
VL - 15
SP - 379
EP - 399
JO - Annual Review of Political Science
JF - Annual Review of Political Science
ER -