TY - JOUR
T1 - Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation
T2 - In a patient with a left ventricular assist device already in place
AU - Gupta, Ashwani
AU - Subzposh, Faiz
AU - Hankins, Shelley R.
AU - Kutalek, Steven P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 by the Texas Heart ® Institute, Houston.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - A 56-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy, a biventricular implantable cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD), and a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) developed a pocket hematoma and infection after an ICD generator change. The biventricular ICD was extracted, and the patient was given a full course of antibiotics. Because he had no indications for bradycardia pacing or biventricular pacing, he was implanted with a subcutaneous ICD under full anticoagulation. There was no interference in sensing or shock delivery from the ICD. The LVAD readings were unchanged during and after the procedure. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course, and both devices were functioning normally. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the implantation of a subcutaneous ICD in the presence of an LVAD. This report illustrates that both devices can be implanted successfully in the same patient. In addition, the subcutaneous ICD minimizes the risk of bloodstream infections, which can be fatal in patients who have life-supporting devices such as an LVAD.
AB - A 56-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy, a biventricular implantable cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD), and a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) developed a pocket hematoma and infection after an ICD generator change. The biventricular ICD was extracted, and the patient was given a full course of antibiotics. Because he had no indications for bradycardia pacing or biventricular pacing, he was implanted with a subcutaneous ICD under full anticoagulation. There was no interference in sensing or shock delivery from the ICD. The LVAD readings were unchanged during and after the procedure. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course, and both devices were functioning normally. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the implantation of a subcutaneous ICD in the presence of an LVAD. This report illustrates that both devices can be implanted successfully in the same patient. In addition, the subcutaneous ICD minimizes the risk of bloodstream infections, which can be fatal in patients who have life-supporting devices such as an LVAD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927930784&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927930784&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14503/THIJ-14-4166
DO - 10.14503/THIJ-14-4166
M3 - Article
C2 - 25873825
AN - SCOPUS:84927930784
SN - 0730-2347
VL - 42
SP - 140
EP - 143
JO - Texas Heart Institute Journal
JF - Texas Heart Institute Journal
IS - 2
ER -