TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings
AU - Chen, Ying
AU - Okudan, Gül E.
AU - Riley, David R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Thanks are due to building industry practitioners for their generous contributions and participation in the questionnaire survey and interviews. Without their input, this research would not have been possible. The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. The financial support of the China Scholarship Council is also gratefully acknowledged.
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - The use of prefabrication offers significant advantages, yet appropriate criteria for applicability assessments to a given building have been found to be deficient. Decisions to use prefabrication are still largely based on anecdotal evidence or simply cost-based evaluation when comparing various construction methods. Holistic criteria are needed to assist with the selection of an appropriate construction method in concrete buildings during early project stages. Following a thorough literature review and comprehensive comparisons between prefabrication and on-site construction method, a total of 33 sustainable performance criteria (SPC) based on the triple bottom line and the requirements of different project stakeholders were identified. A survey of U.S. experienced practitioners including clients/developers, engineers, contractors, and precast concrete manufacturers was conducted to capture their perceptions on the importance of the criteria. The ranking analysis of survey results shows that social awareness and environmental concerns were considered as increasingly important in construction method selections. Factor analysis reveals that these SPCs can be grouped into seven dimensions, namely, economic factors: "long-term cost," "constructability," "quality," and "first cost"; social factors: "impact on health and community," "architectural impact"; and environmental factor: "environmental impact." The resultant list of SPCs provides team members a new way to select a construction method, thereby facilitating the sustainable development of built environment.
AB - The use of prefabrication offers significant advantages, yet appropriate criteria for applicability assessments to a given building have been found to be deficient. Decisions to use prefabrication are still largely based on anecdotal evidence or simply cost-based evaluation when comparing various construction methods. Holistic criteria are needed to assist with the selection of an appropriate construction method in concrete buildings during early project stages. Following a thorough literature review and comprehensive comparisons between prefabrication and on-site construction method, a total of 33 sustainable performance criteria (SPC) based on the triple bottom line and the requirements of different project stakeholders were identified. A survey of U.S. experienced practitioners including clients/developers, engineers, contractors, and precast concrete manufacturers was conducted to capture their perceptions on the importance of the criteria. The ranking analysis of survey results shows that social awareness and environmental concerns were considered as increasingly important in construction method selections. Factor analysis reveals that these SPCs can be grouped into seven dimensions, namely, economic factors: "long-term cost," "constructability," "quality," and "first cost"; social factors: "impact on health and community," "architectural impact"; and environmental factor: "environmental impact." The resultant list of SPCs provides team members a new way to select a construction method, thereby facilitating the sustainable development of built environment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76549129795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76549129795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.10.004
DO - 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.10.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:76549129795
SN - 0926-5805
VL - 19
SP - 235
EP - 244
JO - Automation in Construction
JF - Automation in Construction
IS - 2
ER -