Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Swift XRT observations of the afterglow of XRF 050416A

  • Vanessa Mangano
  • , Valentina La Parola
  • , Giancarlo Cusumano
  • , Teresa Mineo
  • , Daniele Malesani
  • , Jaroslaw Dyks
  • , Sergio Campana
  • , Milvia Capalbi
  • , Guido Chincarini
  • , Paolo Giommi
  • , Alberto Moretti
  • , Matteo Perri
  • , Patrizia Romano
  • , Gianpiero Tagliaferri
  • , David N. Burrows
  • , Neil Gehrels
  • , Olivier Godet
  • , Stephen T. Holland
  • , Jamie A. Kennea
  • , Kim L. Page
  • Judith L. Racusin, Peter W.A. Roming, Bing Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Swift discovered XRF 050416A with the Burst Alert Telescope and began observing it with its narrow-field instruments only 64.5 s after the burst onset. Its very soft spectrum classifies this event as an X-ray flash. The afterglow X-ray emission was monitored up to 74 days after the burst. The X-ray light curve initially decays very fast (decay slope α ∼ 2.4), subsequently flattens (α ∼ 0.44), and eventually steepens again (α ∼ 0.88), similar to many X-ray afterglows. The first and second phases end ∼ 172 and ∼ 1450 s after the burst onset, respectively. We find evidence of spectral evolution from a softer emission with photon index Γ ∼ 3.0 during the initial steep decay, to a harder emission with Γ ∼ 2.0 during the following evolutionary phases. The spectra show intrinsic absorption in the host galaxy with column density of ∼6.8 × 1021 cm-2. The consistency of the initial photon index with the high-energy BAT photon index suggests that the initial fast decaying phase of the X-ray light curve may be the low-energy tail of die prompt emission. The lack of jet break signatures in the X-ray afterglow light curve is not consistent with empirical relations between the source rest-frame peak energy and the collimation-corrected energy of the burst. The standard uniform jet model can give a possible description of the XRF 050416A X-ray afterglow for an opening angle larger than a few tens of degrees, although numerical simulations show that the late-time decay is slightly flatter than expected from on-axis viewing of a uniform jet. A structured Gaussian-type jet model with uniform Lorentz factor distribution and viewing angle outside the Gaussian core is another possibility, although a full agreement with data is not achieved with the numerical models explored.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)403-412
Number of pages10
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume654
Issue number1 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Swift XRT observations of the afterglow of XRF 050416A'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this