TY - JOUR
T1 - Switching to Progressively Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Smokers with Low Socioeconomic Status
T2 - A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Krebs, Nicolle M.
AU - Zhu, Junjia
AU - Wasserman, Emily
AU - Kuprewicz, Robin
AU - Martinez, Diane J.
AU - Veldheer, Susan
AU - Livelsberger, Craig
AU - Modesto, Jennifer
AU - Reinhart, Lisa
AU - Trushin, Neil
AU - Reilly, Samantha M.
AU - Liao, Jason
AU - Fazzi, Alyse
AU - Bascom, Rebecca
AU - Richie, John P.
AU - Foulds, Jonathan
AU - Horn, Kimberly
AU - Muscat, Joshua E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - Introduction: The Food and Drug Administration issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking for setting a product standard for nicotine levels in cigarettes, with an emphasis on minimally or non-Addicting very low nicotine content (VLNC). Methods: A 33 week, two-Arm, double-blind randomized trial conducted in Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA and Washington, DC, USA included adult daily cigarette smokers (≥5 cigarettes per day) with less than a college degree, and who had no plans to quit within the next six months. Participants were randomized to either reduced nicotine content (RNC) study cigarettes tapered every three weeks to a final VLNC (0.2 mg/cigarette) for six weeks or to usual nicotine content (UNC) study cigarettes (11.6 mg/cigarette). Outcomes included acceptability of study cigarettes measured by attrition (primary outcome), compliance, reduction in cigarette dependence and tobacco biomarkers, and post-intervention cessation. Results: The RNC (n = 122) versus UNC (n = 123) group had higher attrition (adjusted Hazard Ratio 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.99 to 5.81). At the end of the intervention, cotinine levels were 50% lower in the RNC group (mean group difference-137 ng/mL; 95% CI-172,-102). The RNC group smoked fewer CPD (-4.1; 95% CI-6.44,-1.75) and had lower carbon monoxide levels (-4.0 ppm; 95% CI-7.7,-0.4). Forty seven percent (29/62) of the RNC group were biochemically-confirmed compliant with smoking VLNC cigarettes (mean cotinine = 8.9 ng/ml). At three month follow-up, only compliant VLNC smokers quit with an assisted quit attempt (N = 6/22, 27%). Conclusions: This study supports a VLNC standard in cigarettes. Implications: Differential dropout and noncompliance indicate some smokers had difficulty transitioning to cigarettes with reduced nicotine. These smokers will benefit from supplemental nicotine in medicinal or noncombustible tobacco products if a nicotine reduction standard is established. Other smokers successfully transitioned to very low nicotine content cigarettes exclusively and substantially reduced their exposure to nicotine.
AB - Introduction: The Food and Drug Administration issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking for setting a product standard for nicotine levels in cigarettes, with an emphasis on minimally or non-Addicting very low nicotine content (VLNC). Methods: A 33 week, two-Arm, double-blind randomized trial conducted in Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA and Washington, DC, USA included adult daily cigarette smokers (≥5 cigarettes per day) with less than a college degree, and who had no plans to quit within the next six months. Participants were randomized to either reduced nicotine content (RNC) study cigarettes tapered every three weeks to a final VLNC (0.2 mg/cigarette) for six weeks or to usual nicotine content (UNC) study cigarettes (11.6 mg/cigarette). Outcomes included acceptability of study cigarettes measured by attrition (primary outcome), compliance, reduction in cigarette dependence and tobacco biomarkers, and post-intervention cessation. Results: The RNC (n = 122) versus UNC (n = 123) group had higher attrition (adjusted Hazard Ratio 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.99 to 5.81). At the end of the intervention, cotinine levels were 50% lower in the RNC group (mean group difference-137 ng/mL; 95% CI-172,-102). The RNC group smoked fewer CPD (-4.1; 95% CI-6.44,-1.75) and had lower carbon monoxide levels (-4.0 ppm; 95% CI-7.7,-0.4). Forty seven percent (29/62) of the RNC group were biochemically-confirmed compliant with smoking VLNC cigarettes (mean cotinine = 8.9 ng/ml). At three month follow-up, only compliant VLNC smokers quit with an assisted quit attempt (N = 6/22, 27%). Conclusions: This study supports a VLNC standard in cigarettes. Implications: Differential dropout and noncompliance indicate some smokers had difficulty transitioning to cigarettes with reduced nicotine. These smokers will benefit from supplemental nicotine in medicinal or noncombustible tobacco products if a nicotine reduction standard is established. Other smokers successfully transitioned to very low nicotine content cigarettes exclusively and substantially reduced their exposure to nicotine.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103392922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103392922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ntr/ntaa247
DO - 10.1093/ntr/ntaa247
M3 - Article
C2 - 33249498
AN - SCOPUS:85103392922
SN - 1462-2203
VL - 23
SP - 992
EP - 1001
JO - Nicotine and Tobacco Research
JF - Nicotine and Tobacco Research
IS - 6
ER -