Abstract
In this first-ever systematic review of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in all federal court cases arising prior to 2011, the authors identified 1713 cases, with 131 cases substantively relevant to mental capacity, criminal intent, sentencing, and attorney malpractice. The majority of cases arose after Atkins v. Virginia, the pivotal Supreme Court case that prohibits the death penalty for mentally disabled persons. Among other things, this study reveals that FASD evidence usually defeats a death penalty sentence, but the lower courts reflect inconsistencies in how courts receive and handle mental health evidence.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 492-509 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Criminal Justice Policy Review |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sword or shield? A systematic review of the roles FASD evidence plays in judicial proceedings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver