TY - JOUR
T1 - Synthetic DNA for Cell Surface Engineering
T2 - Experimental Comparison between Click Conjugation and Lipid Insertion in Terms of Cell Viability, Engineering Efficiency, and Displaying Stability
AU - Wang, Xuelin
AU - Wen, Connie
AU - Davis, Brandon
AU - Shi, Peng
AU - Abune, Lidya
AU - Lee, Kyungsene
AU - Dong, Cheng
AU - Wang, Yong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Chemical Society
PY - 2022/1/26
Y1 - 2022/1/26
N2 - The cell surface can be engineered with synthetic DNA for various applications ranging from cancer immunotherapy to tissue engineering. However, while elegant methods such as click conjugation and lipid insertion have been developed to engineer the cell surface with DNA, little effort has been made to systematically evaluate and compare these methods. Resultantly, it is often challenging to choose a right method for a certain application or to interpret data from different studies. In this study, we systematically evaluated click conjugation and lipid insertion in terms of cell viability, engineering efficiency, and displaying stability. Cells engineered with both methods can maintain high viability when the concentration of modified DNA is less than 25–50 μM. However, lipid insertion is faster and more efficient in displaying DNA on the cell surface than click conjugation. The efficiency of displaying DNA with lipid insertion is 10–40 times higher than that with click conjugation for a large range of DNA concentration. However, the half-life of physically inserted DNA on the cell surface is 3–4 times lower than that of covalently conjugated DNA, which depends on the working temperature. While the half-life of physically inserted DNA molecules on the cell surface is shorter than that of DNA molecules clicked onto the cell surface, lipid insertion is more effective than click conjugation in the promotion of cell–cell interactions under the two different experimental settings. The data acquired in this work are expected to act as a guideline for choosing an approximate method for engineering the cell surface with synthetic DNA or even other biomolecules.
AB - The cell surface can be engineered with synthetic DNA for various applications ranging from cancer immunotherapy to tissue engineering. However, while elegant methods such as click conjugation and lipid insertion have been developed to engineer the cell surface with DNA, little effort has been made to systematically evaluate and compare these methods. Resultantly, it is often challenging to choose a right method for a certain application or to interpret data from different studies. In this study, we systematically evaluated click conjugation and lipid insertion in terms of cell viability, engineering efficiency, and displaying stability. Cells engineered with both methods can maintain high viability when the concentration of modified DNA is less than 25–50 μM. However, lipid insertion is faster and more efficient in displaying DNA on the cell surface than click conjugation. The efficiency of displaying DNA with lipid insertion is 10–40 times higher than that with click conjugation for a large range of DNA concentration. However, the half-life of physically inserted DNA on the cell surface is 3–4 times lower than that of covalently conjugated DNA, which depends on the working temperature. While the half-life of physically inserted DNA molecules on the cell surface is shorter than that of DNA molecules clicked onto the cell surface, lipid insertion is more effective than click conjugation in the promotion of cell–cell interactions under the two different experimental settings. The data acquired in this work are expected to act as a guideline for choosing an approximate method for engineering the cell surface with synthetic DNA or even other biomolecules.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123879151&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123879151&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acsami.1c22774
DO - 10.1021/acsami.1c22774
M3 - Article
C2 - 35020367
AN - SCOPUS:85123879151
SN - 1944-8244
VL - 14
SP - 3900
EP - 3909
JO - ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces
JF - ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces
IS - 3
ER -