TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic review of carbon-neutral building technologies (CNBTs) by climate groups and building types
AU - Lee, Gyueun
AU - Avelina, Nadia
AU - Rim, Donghyun
AU - Chi, Seokho
AU - Ahn, Hyeunguk
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/11/1
Y1 - 2023/11/1
N2 - As buildings are responsible for approximately 40% of global greenhouse gas emissions, existing literature provides information about the impacts of carbon-neutral building technologies (CNBTs). However, these impacts can vary across different climate groups and building types. To address this research gap, we conducted a comprehensive review of 65 peer-reviewed papers that focused on state-of-the-art CNBTs. To quantitatively compare the impacts of CNBTs, pre- and post-energy use intensities as well as payback periods were investigated. The results show notable differences in energy saving potentials depending on the climate group. However, regardless of local climate, carbon reduction potential is greater for non-residential than residential buildings. The building type also influences the optimal payback periods for CNBTs. Overall, the review results suggest that for countries with limited time and resources, CNBTs could be firstly implemented to non-residential buildings and gradually extended to residential buildings. Furthermore, the study findings reveal that rather than relying upon a single technology alone, integrating other building design features with CNBTs, such as renewable energy sources or system improvements, can effectively reduce the undesirably long payback periods, thereby ultimately achieving carbon neutrality with econmic feasibility.
AB - As buildings are responsible for approximately 40% of global greenhouse gas emissions, existing literature provides information about the impacts of carbon-neutral building technologies (CNBTs). However, these impacts can vary across different climate groups and building types. To address this research gap, we conducted a comprehensive review of 65 peer-reviewed papers that focused on state-of-the-art CNBTs. To quantitatively compare the impacts of CNBTs, pre- and post-energy use intensities as well as payback periods were investigated. The results show notable differences in energy saving potentials depending on the climate group. However, regardless of local climate, carbon reduction potential is greater for non-residential than residential buildings. The building type also influences the optimal payback periods for CNBTs. Overall, the review results suggest that for countries with limited time and resources, CNBTs could be firstly implemented to non-residential buildings and gradually extended to residential buildings. Furthermore, the study findings reveal that rather than relying upon a single technology alone, integrating other building design features with CNBTs, such as renewable energy sources or system improvements, can effectively reduce the undesirably long payback periods, thereby ultimately achieving carbon neutrality with econmic feasibility.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171613566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85171613566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107627
DO - 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107627
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85171613566
SN - 2352-7102
VL - 78
JO - Journal of Building Engineering
JF - Journal of Building Engineering
M1 - 107627
ER -