Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

T locus shows no evidence for linkage disequilibrium or mutation in American caucasian neural tube defect families

  • Marcy C. Speer
  • , Elizabeth C. Melvin
  • , Kristi D. Viles
  • , Kim A. Bauer
  • , Evadnie Rampersaud
  • , Courtney Drake
  • , Timothy M. George
  • , David S. Enterline
  • , Joanne F. Mackey
  • , Gordon Worley
  • , John R. Gilbert
  • , Jeffery S. Nye
  • , Joanna Aben
  • , Arthur Aylsworth
  • , Cynthia Powell
  • , Timothy Brei
  • , Connie Buran
  • , Joann Bodurtha
  • , Kathleen Sawin
  • , Mark S. Dias
  • Bennans Iskandar, Bonnie Ohm, Nicole Lasarsky, David McLone, Joy Ito, W. Jerry Oakes, Marion Walker, Paula Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We investigated the T locus as a candidate gene in a series of patients and families with lumbosacral myelomeningocele. Single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis was used to identify sequence variation in all 8 exons and in intron 7 of this locus. We found evidence of substantial polymorphism within this locus, as previously reported [Papapetrou et al., 1999, J Med Genet 36:208-213], and moderately significant evidence of linkage disequilibrium with the CacI polymorphism of exon 8. However, when the locus was considered as a whole, with all single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) integrated into a haplotype, there was no evidence for linkage disequilibrium. In addition, we did not identify any new sequence variants. Thus, we conclude that the T locus is not a major locus for human NTDs in this sample.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-218
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics
Volume110
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2002

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'T locus shows no evidence for linkage disequilibrium or mutation in American caucasian neural tube defect families'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this