TY - JOUR
T1 - Tapping environmental history to recreate America's colonial hydrology
AU - Pastore, Christopher L.
AU - Green, Mark B.
AU - Bain, Daniel J.
AU - Muñoz-Hernandez, Andrea
AU - Vörösmarty, Charles J.
AU - Arrigo, Jennifer
AU - Brandt, Sara
AU - Duncan, Jonathan M.
AU - Greco, Francesca
AU - Kim, Hyojin
AU - Kumar, Sanjiv
AU - Lally, Michael
AU - Parolari, Anthony J.
AU - Pellerin, Brian
AU - Salant, Nira
AU - Schlosser, Adam
AU - Zalzal, Kate
PY - 2010/12/1
Y1 - 2010/12/1
N2 - By synthesizing published scientific studies with contemporary data sets and corroborating those results with the ork of environmental historians, we believe it is possible to reconstruct colonial American hydrology on the regional scale. Such an endeavor, we believe, would be of broad utility of the environmental sciences because understanding the ways humans shaped the hydrology of the past is vital to our understanding of the present and future. Our conceptual model centralizes the role of humans in the hydrologic cycle and considers human-induced feedback loops with respect to changes to land cover, engineering, and climate. Furthermore, we propose that integrative hydrologic metrics effectively quantify hydrologic change because they can organize wide-ranging datasboth natural and humaninduced variationssinto numeric results. Using metrics, it is possible to compare, contrast, and even rank the drivers of hydrologic change according to their level of impact over time. Finally, our work also unde scores the importance of forging scholarly ties between the sciences and humanities. For hydrologists, corroborating and calibrating scientific data with historical records and even qualitative historical accounts can increase the accuracy of their work. Our work largely synthesized existing literature and published primary sources, but further analysis and integration of archival historical sources into scientific work is needed and will generate an even more precise picture of the U.S.'s ecological past. For historians, empirical understanding of human-water interactions can shed new light on such topics as patterns of human settlement and competition over resources. Hydrologic models can support historical evidence. The synthetic processsone in which historians, geographers, hydrologists, ecologists, and biologists are forced to grapple with the pressing questions of other fieldssencourages scholars to inform their own work with new insights and new perspectives.
AB - By synthesizing published scientific studies with contemporary data sets and corroborating those results with the ork of environmental historians, we believe it is possible to reconstruct colonial American hydrology on the regional scale. Such an endeavor, we believe, would be of broad utility of the environmental sciences because understanding the ways humans shaped the hydrology of the past is vital to our understanding of the present and future. Our conceptual model centralizes the role of humans in the hydrologic cycle and considers human-induced feedback loops with respect to changes to land cover, engineering, and climate. Furthermore, we propose that integrative hydrologic metrics effectively quantify hydrologic change because they can organize wide-ranging datasboth natural and humaninduced variationssinto numeric results. Using metrics, it is possible to compare, contrast, and even rank the drivers of hydrologic change according to their level of impact over time. Finally, our work also unde scores the importance of forging scholarly ties between the sciences and humanities. For hydrologists, corroborating and calibrating scientific data with historical records and even qualitative historical accounts can increase the accuracy of their work. Our work largely synthesized existing literature and published primary sources, but further analysis and integration of archival historical sources into scientific work is needed and will generate an even more precise picture of the U.S.'s ecological past. For historians, empirical understanding of human-water interactions can shed new light on such topics as patterns of human settlement and competition over resources. Hydrologic models can support historical evidence. The synthetic processsone in which historians, geographers, hydrologists, ecologists, and biologists are forced to grapple with the pressing questions of other fieldssencourages scholars to inform their own work with new insights and new perspectives.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650281400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650281400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/es102672c
DO - 10.1021/es102672c
M3 - Article
C2 - 21047116
AN - SCOPUS:78650281400
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 44
SP - 8798
EP - 8803
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 23
ER -