TY - JOUR
T1 - Teachers’ motivation to learn
T2 - implications for supporting professional growth
AU - Appova, Aina
AU - Arbaugh, Fran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 International Professional Development Association (IPDA).
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - In this study, we investigated teachers’ motivation to learn following in the footsteps of emergent research efforts in the field. This qualitative study was grounded in the intersection of four research fields: policy, educational psychology, andragogy and professional development (PD). Findings indicate that teachers’ dissatisfactions with their teaching and students’ learning motivated them to learn professionally. Specifically, they internalized images of ‘perfect’ teaching/teachers and constantly compared themselves with those images–their (perceived) images of less-than-optimal teaching motivated teachers to continue pursuing PD to become ‘better’ teachers. Findings also indicate that current PD requirements, which place too much focus on quantity rather than quality of teachers’ learning, discourage teachers to pursue high-quality PD. Moreover, lack of stipends/resources, not generally available to teachers to pursue PD outside their contract hours, demotivated teachers’ learning and left them feeling skeptical about their district’s genuine investment in/appreciation of teachers’ learning. Implications from this study include offering specific PD suggestions, as well as critical avenues for further examining teachers’ motivation to learn as a research topic and theoretical construct.
AB - In this study, we investigated teachers’ motivation to learn following in the footsteps of emergent research efforts in the field. This qualitative study was grounded in the intersection of four research fields: policy, educational psychology, andragogy and professional development (PD). Findings indicate that teachers’ dissatisfactions with their teaching and students’ learning motivated them to learn professionally. Specifically, they internalized images of ‘perfect’ teaching/teachers and constantly compared themselves with those images–their (perceived) images of less-than-optimal teaching motivated teachers to continue pursuing PD to become ‘better’ teachers. Findings also indicate that current PD requirements, which place too much focus on quantity rather than quality of teachers’ learning, discourage teachers to pursue high-quality PD. Moreover, lack of stipends/resources, not generally available to teachers to pursue PD outside their contract hours, demotivated teachers’ learning and left them feeling skeptical about their district’s genuine investment in/appreciation of teachers’ learning. Implications from this study include offering specific PD suggestions, as well as critical avenues for further examining teachers’ motivation to learn as a research topic and theoretical construct.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014570893&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014570893&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19415257.2017.1280524
DO - 10.1080/19415257.2017.1280524
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85014570893
SN - 1941-5257
VL - 44
SP - 5
EP - 21
JO - Professional Development in Education
JF - Professional Development in Education
IS - 1
ER -