TY - JOUR
T1 - Teachers’ Noticing of Students’ Slope Statements
T2 - Attending and Interpreting
AU - Styers, Jodie L.
AU - Nagle, Courtney R.
AU - Moore-Russo, Deborah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE).
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - In this study, we investigate a sample of in-service teachers’ professional noticing of slope. The analysis focuses on which elements of students’ statements about slope teachers attend to, and how teachers interpreted those elements. Study results suggest that teachers attended to the vocabulary and mathematical focus of students’ statements. Teachers’ interpretations were, for the most part, rather consistent across teachers and in line with the researchers’ anticipations for elicited slope components. In fact, even for vague student statements expected to elicit a variety of interpretations by teachers, there was a noted lack of diversity in teachers’ interpretations. Results for teachers’ interpretations suggest they place great academic value on nonvisual slope reasoning and attribute the ability to solve real-world problems to students who used “rate of change” terminology. Other real-world interpretations of slope were interpreted as disconnected from the mathematical meaning of slope or only trivially linked to contextual situations. Findings from this study imply that teachers should be provided with professional development opportunities involving slope. Specifically, teachers need experiences interacting with tasks that build robust notions of steepness through explicit connections to a variety of physical contexts by allowing students to develop imagery and mathematical terminology in rich and meaningful ways. In addition, professional development should help uncover the meaning behind students’ vocabulary rather than having them focus on buzz words and catch phrases, which may be used without understanding.
AB - In this study, we investigate a sample of in-service teachers’ professional noticing of slope. The analysis focuses on which elements of students’ statements about slope teachers attend to, and how teachers interpreted those elements. Study results suggest that teachers attended to the vocabulary and mathematical focus of students’ statements. Teachers’ interpretations were, for the most part, rather consistent across teachers and in line with the researchers’ anticipations for elicited slope components. In fact, even for vague student statements expected to elicit a variety of interpretations by teachers, there was a noted lack of diversity in teachers’ interpretations. Results for teachers’ interpretations suggest they place great academic value on nonvisual slope reasoning and attribute the ability to solve real-world problems to students who used “rate of change” terminology. Other real-world interpretations of slope were interpreted as disconnected from the mathematical meaning of slope or only trivially linked to contextual situations. Findings from this study imply that teachers should be provided with professional development opportunities involving slope. Specifically, teachers need experiences interacting with tasks that build robust notions of steepness through explicit connections to a variety of physical contexts by allowing students to develop imagery and mathematical terminology in rich and meaningful ways. In addition, professional development should help uncover the meaning behind students’ vocabulary rather than having them focus on buzz words and catch phrases, which may be used without understanding.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090301844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090301844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s42330-020-00107-5
DO - 10.1007/s42330-020-00107-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85090301844
SN - 1492-6156
VL - 20
SP - 504
EP - 520
JO - Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education
JF - Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education
IS - 3
ER -