TY - JOUR
T1 - Teaching experiments and professional development
AU - Norton, Anderson Hassell
AU - McCloskey, Andrea
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments A Maris M. Proffitt and Mary Higgins Proffitt Endowment Grant and Summer Faculty Fellowship funded the research reported here. We thank Amy Hackenberg and Signe Kastberg for their responses to earlier drafts.
Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - The challenge that we address concerns teachers' shifts toward student-centered instruction. We report on a yearlong professional development study in which two United States elementary school teachers engaged in a teaching experiment, as described by Steffe and Thompson (in: Lesh and Kelly (eds) Research on design in mathematics and science education, 2000). The teaching experiment involved close mathematical interactions with a pair of students after school, in the context of solving fractions tasks. By conducting a teaching experiment, we anticipated that each teacher would have more opportunity to develop insight into students' mathematics. We also anticipated that these insights would influence the teachers' classroom practice, even without explicit support for such a shift. Indeed, the teachers found that they began asking more probing questions of their students and spending more time listening to students' explanations, but shifts to classroom practice were limited by constraining factors such an inflexible curriculum.
AB - The challenge that we address concerns teachers' shifts toward student-centered instruction. We report on a yearlong professional development study in which two United States elementary school teachers engaged in a teaching experiment, as described by Steffe and Thompson (in: Lesh and Kelly (eds) Research on design in mathematics and science education, 2000). The teaching experiment involved close mathematical interactions with a pair of students after school, in the context of solving fractions tasks. By conducting a teaching experiment, we anticipated that each teacher would have more opportunity to develop insight into students' mathematics. We also anticipated that these insights would influence the teachers' classroom practice, even without explicit support for such a shift. Indeed, the teachers found that they began asking more probing questions of their students and spending more time listening to students' explanations, but shifts to classroom practice were limited by constraining factors such an inflexible curriculum.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50249134139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50249134139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10857-008-9076-x
DO - 10.1007/s10857-008-9076-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:50249134139
SN - 1386-4416
VL - 11
SP - 285
EP - 305
JO - Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
JF - Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
IS - 4
ER -