@article{60a117d358424f1aa7825388f2fdc835,
title = "Teaching families to manage intake of candy in the home: Results from a feasibility study using multiphase optimization strategy (MOST)",
abstract = "Background: Excess intake of desserts/sweets high in added sugars, such as candy, is linked with greater obesity risk. Parents often limit their childrens' intake of these sweet foods using controlling feeding practices, such as restriction; yet, restrictive feeding practices are counterproductive for childrens' self-regulation of energy intake. Objective: This study developed a family-based behavioural intervention that taught parents alternatives to restrictive feeding practices and encouraged children to consume candy in moderation. Methods: Using the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), parent–child dyads (N = 37) were randomized into one of eight conditions that included a combination of intervention components delivered over 4 weeks: home supply, parent shared decision making, child mindfulness and child attention control strategies. Results: Retention rate at follow-up was high (95%). Among parents who received parent shared decision making, 86.4% reported the structured-based candy routine they set with their child was easy to follow. Most children reported child mindfulness (95%) and attention control (89.5%) strategies were easy to play. Children recalled 4.1 ± 1.8 of the six mindfulness strategies and 2.7 ± 1.6 of the five attention control strategies at follow-up. Eating in the absence of hunger tended to be lower for children who received parent shared decision making and child mindfulness components. Conclusion: This intervention was feasible and well-implemented in the home environment. Findings will inform future, larger interventions designed to test similar strategies on childrens; eating behaviours and self-regulation.",
author = "Savage, {J. S.} and Adams, {E. L.} and Rollins, {B. Y.} and Bleser, {J. A.} and Marini, {M. E.}",
note = "Funding Information: The National Confectioners Association supported this research. Additional support was received from USDA National Institute for Food and Agriculture (grant # 2011-67001-30117). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Confectioners' Association or USDA. The authors would like to acknowledge Leann L. Birch, PhD for contributing to the conceptual design on this project. Funding Information: The National Confectioners Association supported this research. Additional support was received from USDA National Institute for Food and Agriculture (grant # 2011‐67001‐30117). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Confectioners' Association or USDA. The authors would like to acknowledge Leann L. Birch, PhD for contributing to the conceptual design on this project. Funding Information: Outside of this current work, Jennifer Savage reports personal fees from Let us Go Maine, American Academy of Paediatrics, Danone Happy Baby Organics, as well as grants from the National Institute of Health. Brandi Rollins reports grants, personal fees, and non‐financial support from National Confectioner's Association during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by World Obesity and The Obesity Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1002/osp4.446",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "649--659",
journal = "Obesity Science and Practice",
issn = "2055-2238",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",
}