TY - JOUR
T1 - Television food advertising to children
T2 - A global perspective
AU - Kelly, Bridget
AU - Halford, Jason C.G.
AU - Boyland, Emma J.
AU - Chapman, Kathy
AU - Bautista-Castaño, Inmaculada
AU - Berg, Christina
AU - Caroli, Margherita
AU - Cook, Brian
AU - Coutinho, Janine G.
AU - Effertz, Tobias
AU - Grammatikaki, Evangelia
AU - Keller, Kathleen
AU - Leung, Raymond
AU - Manios, Yannis
AU - Pedley, Claire
AU - Prell, Hillevi
AU - Raine, Kim
AU - Recine, Elisabetta
AU - Serra-Majem, Lluis
AU - Singh, Sonia
AU - Summerbell, Carolyn
PY - 2010/9/1
Y1 - 2010/9/1
N2 - Objectives. We compared television food advertising to children in several countries. Methods. We undertook a collaboration among 13 research groups in Australia, Asia, Western Europe, and North and South America. Each group recorded programming for 2 weekdays and 2 weekend days between 6:00 and 22:00, for the 3 channels most watched by children, between October 2007 and March 2008. We classified food advertisements as core (nutrient dense, low in energy), noncore (high in undesirable nutrients or energy, as defined by dietary standards), or miscellaneous. We also categorized thematic content (promotional characters and premiums). Results. Food advertisements composed 11% to 29% of advertisements. Noncore foods were featured in 53% to 87% of food advertisements, and the rate of noncore food advertising was higher during children's peak viewing times. Most food advertisements containing persuasive marketing were for noncore products. Conclusions. Across all sampled countries, children were exposed to high volumes of television advertising for unhealthy foods, featuring child-oriented persuasive techniques. Because of the proven connections between food advertising, preferences, and consumption, our findings lend support to calls for regulation of food advertising during children's peak viewing times.
AB - Objectives. We compared television food advertising to children in several countries. Methods. We undertook a collaboration among 13 research groups in Australia, Asia, Western Europe, and North and South America. Each group recorded programming for 2 weekdays and 2 weekend days between 6:00 and 22:00, for the 3 channels most watched by children, between October 2007 and March 2008. We classified food advertisements as core (nutrient dense, low in energy), noncore (high in undesirable nutrients or energy, as defined by dietary standards), or miscellaneous. We also categorized thematic content (promotional characters and premiums). Results. Food advertisements composed 11% to 29% of advertisements. Noncore foods were featured in 53% to 87% of food advertisements, and the rate of noncore food advertising was higher during children's peak viewing times. Most food advertisements containing persuasive marketing were for noncore products. Conclusions. Across all sampled countries, children were exposed to high volumes of television advertising for unhealthy foods, featuring child-oriented persuasive techniques. Because of the proven connections between food advertising, preferences, and consumption, our findings lend support to calls for regulation of food advertising during children's peak viewing times.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956239494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956239494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2009.179267
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2009.179267
M3 - Review article
C2 - 20634464
AN - SCOPUS:77956239494
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 100
SP - 1730
EP - 1736
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
IS - 9
ER -