TY - JOUR
T1 - Test of the definition of learning disability based on the difference between IQ and achievement
AU - Mayes, Susan Dickerson
AU - Calhoun, Susan L.
PY - 2005/8
Y1 - 2005/8
N2 - A learning disability is commonly defined as a discrepancy between IQ and achievement. This has been criticized for identifying too many children as having a learning disability who have high IQs and average academic achievement. Such overidentification as actually occurred was assessed in 473 referred children (8-16 years, M = 10, SD = 2) with normal intelligence. Learning disability was defined as a significant discrepancy (p<.05) between predicted and obtained achievement in reading, mathematics, or written expression on the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. Predicted achievement was based on the child's WISC-III Full Scale IQ. Overidentification was considered to occur when a child scored at or above age level in reading, mathematics, and writing but still had a significant discrepancy between predicted and obtained achievement by virtue of a high IQ. Learning disability was diagnosed in 312 (66%) of the children. There was no overidentification because all children had one or more WIAT scores below the normative level for their age, i.e., <100. Further, only 7% of the children were identified with a learning disability based on a WIAT score in the 90s. These children had a mean IQ of 123 and were rated by their teachers and parents as having learning problems.
AB - A learning disability is commonly defined as a discrepancy between IQ and achievement. This has been criticized for identifying too many children as having a learning disability who have high IQs and average academic achievement. Such overidentification as actually occurred was assessed in 473 referred children (8-16 years, M = 10, SD = 2) with normal intelligence. Learning disability was defined as a significant discrepancy (p<.05) between predicted and obtained achievement in reading, mathematics, or written expression on the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. Predicted achievement was based on the child's WISC-III Full Scale IQ. Overidentification was considered to occur when a child scored at or above age level in reading, mathematics, and writing but still had a significant discrepancy between predicted and obtained achievement by virtue of a high IQ. Learning disability was diagnosed in 312 (66%) of the children. There was no overidentification because all children had one or more WIAT scores below the normative level for their age, i.e., <100. Further, only 7% of the children were identified with a learning disability based on a WIAT score in the 90s. These children had a mean IQ of 123 and were rated by their teachers and parents as having learning problems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744455631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744455631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2466/pr0.97.1.109-116
DO - 10.2466/pr0.97.1.109-116
M3 - Article
C2 - 16279312
AN - SCOPUS:27744455631
SN - 0033-2941
VL - 97
SP - 109
EP - 116
JO - Psychological reports
JF - Psychological reports
IS - 1
ER -