Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: A committee opinion

Samantha Pfeifer; Samantha Butts; Daniel Dumesic; Gregory Fossum; Linda Giudice; Clarisa Gracia; Andrew La Barbera; Randall Odem; Margareta Pisarska; Robert Rebar; Reindollar Richard; Mitchell Rosen; Jay Sandlow; Michael Vernon; Eric Widra

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.093

Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: A committee opinion

Samantha Pfeifer, Samantha Butts, Daniel Dumesic, Gregory Fossum, Linda Giudice, Clarisa Gracia, Andrew La Barbera, Randall Odem, Margareta Pisarska, Robert Rebar, Reindollar Richard, Mitchell Rosen, Jay Sandlow, Michael Vernon, Eric Widra

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

285 Scopus citations

Abstract

Currently there is no uniformly accepted definition of decreased ovarian reserve (DOR), as the term may refer to three related but distinctly different outcomes: oocyte quality, oocyte quantity, or reproductive potential. Available evidence concerning the performance of ovarian reserve tests is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity among study design, analyses and outcomes, and the lack of validated outcome measures.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	e9-e17
Journal	Fertility and sterility
Volume	103
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.093
State	Published - Mar 1 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Reproductive Medicine
Obstetrics and Gynecology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.093

Cite this

@article{f99447b2d9b0488ea51bd5b000ed7345,

title = "Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: A committee opinion",

abstract = "Currently there is no uniformly accepted definition of decreased ovarian reserve (DOR), as the term may refer to three related but distinctly different outcomes: oocyte quality, oocyte quantity, or reproductive potential. Available evidence concerning the performance of ovarian reserve tests is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity among study design, analyses and outcomes, and the lack of validated outcome measures.",

author = "Samantha Pfeifer and Samantha Butts and Daniel Dumesic and Gregory Fossum and Linda Giudice and Clarisa Gracia and {La Barbera}, Andrew and Randall Odem and Margareta Pisarska and Robert Rebar and Reindollar Richard and Mitchell Rosen and Jay Sandlow and Michael Vernon and Eric Widra",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine.",

year = "2015",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.093",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "103",

pages = "e9--e17",

journal = "Fertility and sterility",

issn = "0015-0282",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve

T2 - A committee opinion

AU - Pfeifer, Samantha

AU - Butts, Samantha

AU - Dumesic, Daniel

AU - Fossum, Gregory

AU - Giudice, Linda

AU - Gracia, Clarisa

AU - La Barbera, Andrew

AU - Odem, Randall

AU - Pisarska, Margareta

AU - Rebar, Robert

AU - Richard, Reindollar

AU - Rosen, Mitchell

AU - Sandlow, Jay

AU - Vernon, Michael

AU - Widra, Eric

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Currently there is no uniformly accepted definition of decreased ovarian reserve (DOR), as the term may refer to three related but distinctly different outcomes: oocyte quality, oocyte quantity, or reproductive potential. Available evidence concerning the performance of ovarian reserve tests is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity among study design, analyses and outcomes, and the lack of validated outcome measures.

AB - Currently there is no uniformly accepted definition of decreased ovarian reserve (DOR), as the term may refer to three related but distinctly different outcomes: oocyte quality, oocyte quantity, or reproductive potential. Available evidence concerning the performance of ovarian reserve tests is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity among study design, analyses and outcomes, and the lack of validated outcome measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926215540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926215540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.093

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.093

M3 - Article

C2 - 25585505

AN - SCOPUS:84926215540

SN - 0015-0282

VL - 103

SP - e9-e17

JO - Fertility and sterility

JF - Fertility and sterility

IS - 3

ER -

Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: A committee opinion

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this