TY - JOUR
T1 - Testing biodegradable films as alternatives to plastic films in enhancing cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)yield under mulched drip irrigation
AU - Wang, Zhenhua
AU - Wu, Qiang
AU - Fan, Bihang
AU - Zhang, Jinzhu
AU - Li, Wenhao
AU - Zheng, Xurong
AU - Lin, Henry
AU - Guo, Li
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of China ( 51741908 ) and the Program for Technology Support “Water saving technology integration and demonstration of large irrigation area in inland river basin” ( 2015BAD20B03-3 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - To alleviate soil pollution caused by mulching polyethylene (PE)films that are non-degradable and non-recoverable, we evaluated different biodegradable (BD)films (starch-polymer, polybutyrate adipate terephthalate or PBAT, and butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate or PBSA)as alternatives to PE films for mulched drip irrigation in a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)field in Xinjiang, the largest cotton-planting region in China. Film degradation, soil salinity, residue film accumulation, cotton yield, and water use efficiency (WUE)were compared between BD and PE films in two consecutive years (2015–2016). We found that the accumulation of residual film was significantly stronger in plots covered by PE films than by BD films. At the early stage of cotton growth, BD and PE films performed similarly in conserving water in topsoil (0–40 cm depth). Degradation of BD films initiated 40–60 days after sowing. Thus, at the late stage of cotton growth, PE films remained intact and were more effective than BD films in wetting the soil. Due to the drier soil, soil salinity in plots covered by BD films was higher than those by PE films. PBAT films showed a slower degradation process than PBSA and starch films under the mulching condition but degraded more completely after buried in soil. After mulched drip irrigation was managed for two years, cotton yield showed no significant difference between plots with PE films (5722 kg ha−1)and those with thicker PBAT films (5699 kg ha−1). However, mulching PE films resulted in a significantly higher WUE than BD films. Therefore, we suggest thicker PBAT films (with the highest yield and WUE and the lowest accumulation of residual film)as potential alternatives to PE films to improve cotton yield and control soil pollution under mulched drip irrigation.
AB - To alleviate soil pollution caused by mulching polyethylene (PE)films that are non-degradable and non-recoverable, we evaluated different biodegradable (BD)films (starch-polymer, polybutyrate adipate terephthalate or PBAT, and butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate or PBSA)as alternatives to PE films for mulched drip irrigation in a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)field in Xinjiang, the largest cotton-planting region in China. Film degradation, soil salinity, residue film accumulation, cotton yield, and water use efficiency (WUE)were compared between BD and PE films in two consecutive years (2015–2016). We found that the accumulation of residual film was significantly stronger in plots covered by PE films than by BD films. At the early stage of cotton growth, BD and PE films performed similarly in conserving water in topsoil (0–40 cm depth). Degradation of BD films initiated 40–60 days after sowing. Thus, at the late stage of cotton growth, PE films remained intact and were more effective than BD films in wetting the soil. Due to the drier soil, soil salinity in plots covered by BD films was higher than those by PE films. PBAT films showed a slower degradation process than PBSA and starch films under the mulching condition but degraded more completely after buried in soil. After mulched drip irrigation was managed for two years, cotton yield showed no significant difference between plots with PE films (5722 kg ha−1)and those with thicker PBAT films (5699 kg ha−1). However, mulching PE films resulted in a significantly higher WUE than BD films. Therefore, we suggest thicker PBAT films (with the highest yield and WUE and the lowest accumulation of residual film)as potential alternatives to PE films to improve cotton yield and control soil pollution under mulched drip irrigation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065813474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065813474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.still.2019.05.004
DO - 10.1016/j.still.2019.05.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065813474
SN - 0167-1987
VL - 192
SP - 196
EP - 205
JO - Soil and Tillage Research
JF - Soil and Tillage Research
ER -