TY - JOUR
T1 - Testing the asteroseismic mass scale using metal-poor stars characterized with APOGEE and Kepler
AU - Epstein, Courtney R.
AU - Elsworth, Yvonne P.
AU - Johnson, Jennifer A.
AU - Shetrone, Matthew
AU - Mosser, Benoît
AU - Hekker, Saskia
AU - Tayar, Jamie
AU - Harding, Paul
AU - Pinsonneault, Marc
AU - Silva Aguirre, Víctor
AU - Basu, Sarbani
AU - Beers, Timothy C.
AU - Bizyaev, Dmitry
AU - Bedding, Timothy R.
AU - Chaplin, William J.
AU - Frinchaboy, Peter M.
AU - García, Rafael A.
AU - Pérez, Ana E.García
AU - Hearty, Fred R.
AU - Huber, Daniel
AU - Ivans, Inese I.
AU - Majewski, Steven R.
AU - Mathur, Savita
AU - Nidever, David
AU - Serenelli, Aldo
AU - Schiavon, Ricardo P.
AU - Schneider, Donald P.
AU - Schönrich, Ralph
AU - Sobeck, Jennifer S.
AU - Stassun, Keivan G.
AU - Stello, Dennis
AU - Zasowski, Gail
PY - 2014/4/20
Y1 - 2014/4/20
N2 - Fundamental stellar properties, such as mass, radius, and age, can be inferred using asteroseismology. Cool stars with convective envelopes have turbulent motions that can stochastically drive and damp pulsations. The properties of the oscillation frequency power spectrum can be tied to mass and radius through solar-scaled asteroseismic relations. Stellar properties derived using these scaling relations need verification over a range of metallicities. Because the age and mass of halo stars are well-constrained by astrophysical priors, they provide an independent, empirical check on asteroseismic mass estimates in the low-metallicity regime. We identify nine metal-poor red giants (including six stars that are kinematically associated with the halo) from a sample observed by both the Kepler space telescope and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III APOGEE spectroscopic survey. We compare masses inferred using asteroseismology to those expected for halo and thick-disk stars. Although our sample is small, standard scaling relations, combined with asteroseismic parameters from the APOKASC Catalog, produce masses that are systematically higher (<ΔM > =0.17 ± 0.05 M⊙) than astrophysical expectations. The magnitude of the mass discrepancy is reduced by known theoretical corrections to the measured large frequency separation scaling relationship. Using alternative methods for measuring asteroseismic parameters induces systematic shifts at the 0.04 M⊙ level. We also compare published asteroseismic analyses with scaling relationship masses to examine the impact of using the frequency of maximum power as a constraint. Upcoming APOKASC observations will provide a larger sample of 100 metal-poor stars, important for detailed asteroseismic characterization of Galactic stellar populations.
AB - Fundamental stellar properties, such as mass, radius, and age, can be inferred using asteroseismology. Cool stars with convective envelopes have turbulent motions that can stochastically drive and damp pulsations. The properties of the oscillation frequency power spectrum can be tied to mass and radius through solar-scaled asteroseismic relations. Stellar properties derived using these scaling relations need verification over a range of metallicities. Because the age and mass of halo stars are well-constrained by astrophysical priors, they provide an independent, empirical check on asteroseismic mass estimates in the low-metallicity regime. We identify nine metal-poor red giants (including six stars that are kinematically associated with the halo) from a sample observed by both the Kepler space telescope and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III APOGEE spectroscopic survey. We compare masses inferred using asteroseismology to those expected for halo and thick-disk stars. Although our sample is small, standard scaling relations, combined with asteroseismic parameters from the APOKASC Catalog, produce masses that are systematically higher (<ΔM > =0.17 ± 0.05 M⊙) than astrophysical expectations. The magnitude of the mass discrepancy is reduced by known theoretical corrections to the measured large frequency separation scaling relationship. Using alternative methods for measuring asteroseismic parameters induces systematic shifts at the 0.04 M⊙ level. We also compare published asteroseismic analyses with scaling relationship masses to examine the impact of using the frequency of maximum power as a constraint. Upcoming APOKASC observations will provide a larger sample of 100 metal-poor stars, important for detailed asteroseismic characterization of Galactic stellar populations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898478744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898478744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/2041-8205/785/2/L28
DO - 10.1088/2041-8205/785/2/L28
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84898478744
SN - 2041-8205
VL - 785
JO - Astrophysical Journal Letters
JF - Astrophysical Journal Letters
IS - 2
M1 - L28
ER -