TY - JOUR
T1 - Tests of an ensemble Kalman filter for mesoscale and regional-scale data assimilation. Part III
T2 - Comparison with 3DVAR in a real-data case study
AU - Meng, Zhiyong
AU - Zhang, Fuqing
PY - 2008/2
Y1 - 2008/2
N2 - The feasibility of using an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) for mesoscale and regional-scale data assimilation has been demonstrated in the authors' recent studies via observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) both under a perfect-model assumption and in the presence of significant model error. The current study extends the EnKF to assimilate real-data observations for a warm-season mesoscale convective vortex (MCV) event on 10-12 June 2003. Direct comparison between the EnKF and a three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVAR) system, both implemented in the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF), is carried out. It is found that the EnKF consistently performs better than the 3DVAR method by assimilating either individual or multiple data sources (i.e., sounding, surface, and wind profiler) for this MCV event. Background error covariance plays an important role in the performance of both the EnKF and the 3DVAR system. Proper covariance inflation and the use of different combinations of physical parameterization schemes in different ensemble members (the so-called multfseheme ensemble) can significantly improve the EnKF performance. The 3DVAR system can benefit substantially from using short-term ensembles to improve the prior estimate (with the ensemble mean). Noticeable improvement is also achieved by including some flow dependence in the background error covariance of 3DVAR.
AB - The feasibility of using an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) for mesoscale and regional-scale data assimilation has been demonstrated in the authors' recent studies via observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) both under a perfect-model assumption and in the presence of significant model error. The current study extends the EnKF to assimilate real-data observations for a warm-season mesoscale convective vortex (MCV) event on 10-12 June 2003. Direct comparison between the EnKF and a three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVAR) system, both implemented in the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF), is carried out. It is found that the EnKF consistently performs better than the 3DVAR method by assimilating either individual or multiple data sources (i.e., sounding, surface, and wind profiler) for this MCV event. Background error covariance plays an important role in the performance of both the EnKF and the 3DVAR system. Proper covariance inflation and the use of different combinations of physical parameterization schemes in different ensemble members (the so-called multfseheme ensemble) can significantly improve the EnKF performance. The 3DVAR system can benefit substantially from using short-term ensembles to improve the prior estimate (with the ensemble mean). Noticeable improvement is also achieved by including some flow dependence in the background error covariance of 3DVAR.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44449094042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44449094042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1175/2007MWR2106.1
DO - 10.1175/2007MWR2106.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:44449094042
SN - 0027-0644
VL - 136
SP - 522
EP - 540
JO - Monthly Weather Review
JF - Monthly Weather Review
IS - 2
ER -