TY - JOUR
T1 - The Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework
T2 - Opportunities and challenges in the eastern United States
AU - Duncan, Jonathan M.
AU - Respess, Zachary
AU - Ryan, William
AU - Austin, Robert
AU - Royer, Matthew
AU - Osmond, Deanna
AU - Kleinman, Peter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Agricultural & Environmental Letters published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The Agriculture Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF) applies high-spatial resolution soils and topographic data, now available for many areas of the United States, to precisely locate opportunities for the placement of conservation practices in agricultural watersheds. Application of the ACPF, developed in midwestern landscapes, to watersheds in the eastern United States represents both opportunity and challenge to conservation planning. Based on experience in applying ACPF to eight watersheds in the eastern United States, from Vermont to North Carolina, we assess the toolbox's application in the eastern United States through the lens of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis framework. We see a great future for the ACPF, but its adoption and utility require interaction with scientists and conservation planners familiar with the region to avoid misapplication and ensure appropriate adaptation and interpretation. (Figure presented.).
AB - The Agriculture Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF) applies high-spatial resolution soils and topographic data, now available for many areas of the United States, to precisely locate opportunities for the placement of conservation practices in agricultural watersheds. Application of the ACPF, developed in midwestern landscapes, to watersheds in the eastern United States represents both opportunity and challenge to conservation planning. Based on experience in applying ACPF to eight watersheds in the eastern United States, from Vermont to North Carolina, we assess the toolbox's application in the eastern United States through the lens of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis framework. We see a great future for the ACPF, but its adoption and utility require interaction with scientists and conservation planners familiar with the region to avoid misapplication and ensure appropriate adaptation and interpretation. (Figure presented.).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121552487&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121552487&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ael2.20054
DO - 10.1002/ael2.20054
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85121552487
SN - 2471-9625
VL - 6
JO - Agricultural and Environmental Letters
JF - Agricultural and Environmental Letters
IS - 3
M1 - e20054
ER -