Abstract
The positive and negative externalities from farmland are increasingly a focus of public policy discussion about agriculture and land use. A GIS-based hedonic pricing model shows that agricultural open space increases nearby residential property values, but larger-scale animal operations and mushroom production have negative impacts. Animal production facilities with as few as 200 animal equivalent units reduce nearby property values, but larger facilities do not necessarily generate larger impacts. Because they tend to occur together, the negative impacts of animal agriculture and the positive impacts of open space must be simultaneously modeled to avoid omitted variable bias.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 314-326 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | American Journal of Agricultural Economics |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2005 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The amenity and disamenity impacts of agriculture: Estimates from a hedonic pricing model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver