@article{bea4d085040e42e3b5e6373c02fa2658,
title = "The authors reply",
author = "Tisherman, \{Samuel A.\} and Antionette Spevetz and Blosser, \{Sandralee A.\} and Daniel Brown and Cherylee Chang and Efron, \{Philip A.\} and Michael O'Connor and Sevransky, \{Jonathan E.\} and Wessman, \{Brian T.\}",
note = "Funding Information: quite exciting. We hope that other countries will follow suit and cultural and resilience factors.comparatively lower in our sample,reflecting probably socio- develop a process for breaking down the silos to encourage in-We wish to highlight few points about the study by terest in the field and to develop common requirements to assure Kredentser et al (1). The results interestingly suggested that that all practitioners are well prepared to provide excellent care. exposure to psychoeducation had higher anxiety and de- We look forward to hearing more about the successes and pression score based on Hospital Anxiety and Depression challenges observed as the French innovations are implemented. Scale. Although these results were in contrast with those Dr. Spevetz disclosed that she represents the Society of Crit-with diary, the outcome was similar for posttraumatic stress ical Care Medicine (SCCM) at American Board of Internal symptoms where both diary and psychoeducation seemed Medicine meetings. Dr. Sevransky{\textquoteright}s institution received fund-to have similar effect; although only psychoeducation had ing from the Marcus Foundation, and he received funding from significant difference. We wonder what could be possible SCCM. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not reasons for this. have any potential conflicts ofinterest. Although in the ICU diary arm, family members and ICU",
year = "2019",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0000000000003691",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "e429",
journal = "Critical care medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",
}