Abstract
Roughly equal in terms of the economic value of transactions, B2B (Business-to-Business) marketing sees a small fraction of the academic research attention that B2C (Business-to-Consumer) marketing sees. In this article, I cite some of the reasons for that imbalance. I then highlight three specific areas—B2B Innovation, B2B Buying and B2B Analytics—that have great potential for yielding academically significant research contributions that meet the needs of practitioners. In each area, I sketch the state of knowledge and then identify a few research questions. I then highlight a number of other areas of B2B that offer high potential. Next, I comment on the importance of crafting B2B academic research that is both rigorous and relevant and what we as a profession might do to encourage more such work. I then offer a few thoughts about how to increase the participation of practitioners in the B2B knowledge creation process.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 543-556 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | International Journal of Research in Marketing |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2016 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Marketing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The B2B Knowledge Gap'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver