TY - JOUR
T1 - The benefits and drawbacks of gender typing
T2 - How different dimensions are related to psychological adjustment
AU - Didonato, Matthew D.
AU - Berenbaum, Sheri A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This work was partially supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, HD19644 and HD044398. We thank the following people who contributed to our work: Diane Ruble shared her Gender-Role Attitudes Scale; Arianna Backer, Elise Dreibelbis, Bradley Fesi, Megan Mintzer, Yajeh Ndimbie, Catherine Ravago, Kim Regan, and Sarah Roberts assisted with data collection and processing; Carol Martin and Elaine Blakemore provided thoughtful and helpful comments on an earlier version of the article.
PY - 2011/4
Y1 - 2011/4
N2 - The benefits versus costs of gender typing are not clear: Is adjustment optimal when people identify and act in strongly gendered ways or when they embrace characteristics of both sexes? Previous findings are inconsistent, in part because they are derived from different conceptualizations of gender typing. A comprehensive understanding of the mental health consequences of gender typing requires recognition of the multidimensionality of gender typing and simultaneous consideration of these dimensions. On the basis of previous work on individual measures, we hypothesized that adjustment would be differentially associated with different aspects of gender typing: positively with sex-congruent gender identity and male-typed personality traits, negatively with rigid gender attitudes, and minimally with female-typed personality traits and gender-typed activity interests. Structural equation models were used to enable testing of all associations simultaneously. Results from a sample of 401 undergraduate students supported our hypotheses. For both women and men, adjustment was positively associated with gender-congruent identity, instrumentality, and flexible gender attitudes, and minimally related to activity interests and expressivity. These findings clarify the mental health benefits and costs of gender typing and highlight the multidimensionality of gender typing.
AB - The benefits versus costs of gender typing are not clear: Is adjustment optimal when people identify and act in strongly gendered ways or when they embrace characteristics of both sexes? Previous findings are inconsistent, in part because they are derived from different conceptualizations of gender typing. A comprehensive understanding of the mental health consequences of gender typing requires recognition of the multidimensionality of gender typing and simultaneous consideration of these dimensions. On the basis of previous work on individual measures, we hypothesized that adjustment would be differentially associated with different aspects of gender typing: positively with sex-congruent gender identity and male-typed personality traits, negatively with rigid gender attitudes, and minimally with female-typed personality traits and gender-typed activity interests. Structural equation models were used to enable testing of all associations simultaneously. Results from a sample of 401 undergraduate students supported our hypotheses. For both women and men, adjustment was positively associated with gender-congruent identity, instrumentality, and flexible gender attitudes, and minimally related to activity interests and expressivity. These findings clarify the mental health benefits and costs of gender typing and highlight the multidimensionality of gender typing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952490218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952490218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10508-010-9620-5
DO - 10.1007/s10508-010-9620-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 20364305
AN - SCOPUS:79952490218
SN - 0004-0002
VL - 40
SP - 457
EP - 463
JO - Archives of Sexual Behavior
JF - Archives of Sexual Behavior
IS - 2
ER -
