The Big Squeeze: Factors Contributing to Moral Distress Among Radiologist Clinician-Educators

Lily M. Belfi, Roger J. Bartolotta, Sarah L. Averill, Julie C. Bulman, Alison Chetlen, Ann K. Jay, Sosamma T. Methratta, Lori A. Deitte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Moral distress is a term used to describe the cognitive-emotional dissonance that is experienced when one is compelled to act contrary to one's moral requirements. This occurs as a result of systemic constraints that prevent an individual from taking actions that they perceive as morally right, resulting in a perceived violation of one's core values and duties. There has been a growing interest in the prevalence of moral distress in healthcare, particularly as a root cause of burnout. A recent national survey on moral distress in radiology found that 98% of respondents experienced at least some degree of moral distress with 18% of respondents having left a position due to moral distress. One of the scenarios associated with the highest degree of moral distress related to the conflict that arises when one feels unable to fulfill teaching responsibilities due to high clinical demands. Now more than ever, clinician-educators are asked to do more with less time, fewer resources, and in an increasingly demanding work environment that is often discordant with providing quality education to their learners. In this manuscript, we aim to discuss the factors contributing to moral distress in radiologist clinician-educators as a framework to better understand the implications of these drivers, and to offer our perspective on potential mitigating measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2167-2174
Number of pages8
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this