TY - JOUR
T1 - The Built Environment and Social and Emotional Support among Rural Older Adults
T2 - The Case for Social Infrastructure and Attention to Ethnoracial Differences☆
AU - Rhubart, Danielle
AU - Kowalkowski, Jennifer
AU - Wincott, Logan
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Donald Miller of the Population Research Institute at Penn State University for his input in the early stages of the data analysis. This research was supported by a subaward from the Interdisciplinary Network on Rural Population Health and Aging funded by the National Institute on Aging (R24 AG065159). Dr. Rhubart also acknowledges infrastructural support from the NICHD‐funded Population Research Institute at The Pennsylvania State University (P2CHD041025) and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Multistate Research Project W5001: Rural Population Change and Adaptation in the Context of Health, Economic, and Environmental Shocks and Stressors (#PEN04796, Accession #7003407). Address correspondence to Danielle Rhubart, The Pennsylvania State University, Biobehavioral Health Building, University Park, PA, USA. Email: [email protected]
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Rural Sociology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Rural Sociological Society (RSS).
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Social and emotional support (SaES) is essential for older adult mental health and is shaped by individual-level factors and the built environment. However, much of the focus on the built environment, and specifically social infrastructure—the physical places that facilitate social interaction and social tie formation—relies heavily on urban settings or samples with limited diversity. Consequently, there is little understanding if social infrastructure matters for the SaES of older adults in rural America, and across race and ethnicity. Therefore, we use social cohesion as a conceptual lens and the community gerontology framework to determine whether availability of social infrastructure is associated with SaES among older adults in rural America and whether this relationship varies across race and ethnicity. Using data from 110,850 rural older adults from the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System and data from the National Neighborhood Data Archive, we show that among rural ethnoracial minority older adults, higher densities of social infrastructure are associated with higher SaES. This is not true for rural non-Hispanic White older adults. Results highlight the importance of accounting for both social infrastructure as part of the built environment and heterogeneity across race and ethnicity in studies that examine older adult mental and emotional health.
AB - Social and emotional support (SaES) is essential for older adult mental health and is shaped by individual-level factors and the built environment. However, much of the focus on the built environment, and specifically social infrastructure—the physical places that facilitate social interaction and social tie formation—relies heavily on urban settings or samples with limited diversity. Consequently, there is little understanding if social infrastructure matters for the SaES of older adults in rural America, and across race and ethnicity. Therefore, we use social cohesion as a conceptual lens and the community gerontology framework to determine whether availability of social infrastructure is associated with SaES among older adults in rural America and whether this relationship varies across race and ethnicity. Using data from 110,850 rural older adults from the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System and data from the National Neighborhood Data Archive, we show that among rural ethnoracial minority older adults, higher densities of social infrastructure are associated with higher SaES. This is not true for rural non-Hispanic White older adults. Results highlight the importance of accounting for both social infrastructure as part of the built environment and heterogeneity across race and ethnicity in studies that examine older adult mental and emotional health.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159684661&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85159684661&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ruso.12491
DO - 10.1111/ruso.12491
M3 - Article
C2 - 37829666
AN - SCOPUS:85159684661
SN - 0036-0112
VL - 88
SP - 731
EP - 762
JO - Rural Sociology
JF - Rural Sociology
IS - 3
ER -