The case for intervention bias in the practice of medicine

Andrew Foy, Edward J. Filippone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations


Bias is an inclination to present or hold a partial perspective at the expense of possibly equal or more valid alternatives. In this paper, we present a series of conditional arguments to prove that intervention bias exists in the practice of medicine. We then explore its potential causes, consequences, and criticisms. We use the term to describe the bias on the part of physicians and the medical community to intervene, whether it is with drugs, diagnostic tests, non-invasive procedures, or surgeries, when not intervening would be a reasonable alternative. The recognition of intervention bias in medicine is critically important given today's emphasis on providing high-value care and reducing unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-280
Number of pages10
JournalYale Journal of Biology and Medicine
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'The case for intervention bias in the practice of medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this