TY - JOUR
T1 - The Consequences of Fickle Federal Policy
T2 - Administrative Hurdles for State Cannabis Policies
AU - Mallinson, Daniel J.
AU - Hannah, A. Lee
AU - Cunningham, Gideon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Under the Controlled Substances Act (1970), the federal government classifies cannabis as a Schedule I drug with high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use. Meanwhile, thirty-five states have defied federal prohibition and approved cannabis use for either medical or medical and recreational purposes. States are chipping away at War on Drugs policies with little clear guidance from the federal government. The starkly divergent approaches to cannabis regulation lead to administrative challenges for adopting states and the budding industry. We examine how the federal government’s rhetorical and regulatory fickleness on cannabis policy has led to several downstream administrative consequences in banking, taxes, social equity, and bankruptcy protections. We also discuss whether recent events like the coronavirus pandemic and more state adoptions can accelerate change at the federal level. Finally, we argue for additional research attention to cannabis policy by federalism and public administration scholars.
AB - Under the Controlled Substances Act (1970), the federal government classifies cannabis as a Schedule I drug with high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use. Meanwhile, thirty-five states have defied federal prohibition and approved cannabis use for either medical or medical and recreational purposes. States are chipping away at War on Drugs policies with little clear guidance from the federal government. The starkly divergent approaches to cannabis regulation lead to administrative challenges for adopting states and the budding industry. We examine how the federal government’s rhetorical and regulatory fickleness on cannabis policy has led to several downstream administrative consequences in banking, taxes, social equity, and bankruptcy protections. We also discuss whether recent events like the coronavirus pandemic and more state adoptions can accelerate change at the federal level. Finally, we argue for additional research attention to cannabis policy by federalism and public administration scholars.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098876941&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098876941&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0160323X20984540
DO - 10.1177/0160323X20984540
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098876941
SN - 0160-323X
VL - 52
SP - 241
EP - 254
JO - State and Local Government Review
JF - State and Local Government Review
IS - 4
ER -