TY - JOUR
T1 - The dark triad and workplace behavior
AU - LeBreton, James M.
AU - Shiverdecker, Levi K.
AU - Grimaldi, Elizabeth M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by, or in part by, the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences under contract number W911NF-16-1-0484. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Over the last 15 years, there has been growing fascination among scholars in studying "dark behaviors" and "dark traits," especially as they are expressed in organizational contexts. One taxonomy of dark traits that has garnered special interest is the dark triad (DT), which is comprised of three toxic and malevolent traits: Psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism. This chapter offers a review of DT research, with a particular focus on research relevant to the organizational sciences. We begin with a definition of personality in general and the traits of the DT in particular, including a discussion of the clinical and subclinical variants of these traits. We then review literature linking the DT traits to an array of organizational outcomes, discuss how the DT traits may be assessed, and conclude with recommendations for future work.
AB - Over the last 15 years, there has been growing fascination among scholars in studying "dark behaviors" and "dark traits," especially as they are expressed in organizational contexts. One taxonomy of dark traits that has garnered special interest is the dark triad (DT), which is comprised of three toxic and malevolent traits: Psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism. This chapter offers a review of DT research, with a particular focus on research relevant to the organizational sciences. We begin with a definition of personality in general and the traits of the DT in particular, including a discussion of the clinical and subclinical variants of these traits. We then review literature linking the DT traits to an array of organizational outcomes, discuss how the DT traits may be assessed, and conclude with recommendations for future work.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048373150&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048373150&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104451
DO - 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104451
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85048373150
SN - 2327-0608
VL - 5
SP - 387
EP - 414
JO - Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
JF - Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
ER -