TY - JOUR
T1 - The demise of community responsibility
T2 - Unintended consequences of coverage expansions on California public hospitals
AU - Haeder, Simon F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by Duke University Press.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Long before the establishment of Medicaid or the passage of the Affordable Care Act, California counties provided their poorest residents with access to comprehensive medical care. This article analyzes the creation and closure of public hospitals in the state of California. It combines both qualitative historical research and event history analysis to assess what led first to the creation of the nation's most comprehensive public health network and then to its gradual demise. Strong evidence is presented that the implementation ofMedicaid in California significantly altered the calculus of local governments with regard to the operation of public hospitals. In particular, Medicaid shifted county hospitals from the realm of allocational politics to that of redistributive politics. Subsequently, reforms at the state and federal levels further encouraged this development. Because of this shift,many counties decided to close their hospitals.Moreover, as expected for redistributive policies, the continued operation of public hospitals was driven not by need but instead merely by fiscal capacity: more affluent counties continue to maintain them while poorer, needier counties close their doors.
AB - Long before the establishment of Medicaid or the passage of the Affordable Care Act, California counties provided their poorest residents with access to comprehensive medical care. This article analyzes the creation and closure of public hospitals in the state of California. It combines both qualitative historical research and event history analysis to assess what led first to the creation of the nation's most comprehensive public health network and then to its gradual demise. Strong evidence is presented that the implementation ofMedicaid in California significantly altered the calculus of local governments with regard to the operation of public hospitals. In particular, Medicaid shifted county hospitals from the realm of allocational politics to that of redistributive politics. Subsequently, reforms at the state and federal levels further encouraged this development. Because of this shift,many counties decided to close their hospitals.Moreover, as expected for redistributive policies, the continued operation of public hospitals was driven not by need but instead merely by fiscal capacity: more affluent counties continue to maintain them while poorer, needier counties close their doors.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064477132
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064477132#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1215/03616878-7277356
DO - 10.1215/03616878-7277356
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85064477132
SN - 0361-6878
VL - 44
SP - 173
EP - 219
JO - Journal of health politics, policy and law
JF - Journal of health politics, policy and law
IS - 2
ER -