The differential impact of two training strategies on team performance

Katherine Hamilton; Susan Mohammed

doi:10.1518/107118110X12829370089687

The differential impact of two training strategies on team performance

Katherine Hamilton
, Susan Mohammed

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

The current study examined how training type (cross-training vs. team coordination training) influenced team performance under varying environmental conditions (routine vs. non-routine). Three-hundred and fifty-two undergraduate students (176 dyads) from a large northeastern university participated in the study. Data were collected through the NeoCITIES 1.0 simulation, which is a simulated task environment of an emergency management team. Findings indicated that training type had a significant impact on performance, such that dyads receiving cross-training had higher levels of performance than those receiving team coordination training. However, this effect did not vary across environmental conditions.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010
Pages	1640-1644
Number of pages	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1518/107118110X12829370089687
State	Published - 2010
Event	54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010 - San Francisco, CA, United States Duration: Sep 27 2010 → Oct 1 2010

Publication series

Name	Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Volume	3
ISSN (Print)	1071-1813

Other

Other	54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010
Country/Territory	United States
City	San Francisco, CA
Period	9/27/10 → 10/1/10

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Human Factors and Ergonomics

Access to Document

10.1518/107118110X12829370089687

Cite this

@inproceedings{85668594218749fbafaea17106b942b1,

title = "The differential impact of two training strategies on team performance",

abstract = "The current study examined how training type (cross-training vs. team coordination training) influenced team performance under varying environmental conditions (routine vs. non-routine). Three-hundred and fifty-two undergraduate students (176 dyads) from a large northeastern university participated in the study. Data were collected through the NeoCITIES 1.0 simulation, which is a simulated task environment of an emergency management team. Findings indicated that training type had a significant impact on performance, such that dyads receiving cross-training had higher levels of performance than those receiving team coordination training. However, this effect did not vary across environmental conditions.",

author = "Katherine Hamilton and Susan Mohammed",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.1518/107118110X12829370089687",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9781617820885",

series = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society",

pages = "1640--1644",

booktitle = "54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010",

note = "54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010 ; Conference date: 27-09-2010 Through 01-10-2010",

}

Hamilton, K & Mohammed, S 2010, The differential impact of two training strategies on team performance. in 54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 3, pp. 1640-1644, 54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010, San Francisco, CA, United States, 9/27/10. https://doi.org/10.1518/107118110X12829370089687

TY - GEN

T1 - The differential impact of two training strategies on team performance

AU - Hamilton, Katherine

AU - Mohammed, Susan

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The current study examined how training type (cross-training vs. team coordination training) influenced team performance under varying environmental conditions (routine vs. non-routine). Three-hundred and fifty-two undergraduate students (176 dyads) from a large northeastern university participated in the study. Data were collected through the NeoCITIES 1.0 simulation, which is a simulated task environment of an emergency management team. Findings indicated that training type had a significant impact on performance, such that dyads receiving cross-training had higher levels of performance than those receiving team coordination training. However, this effect did not vary across environmental conditions.

AB - The current study examined how training type (cross-training vs. team coordination training) influenced team performance under varying environmental conditions (routine vs. non-routine). Three-hundred and fifty-two undergraduate students (176 dyads) from a large northeastern university participated in the study. Data were collected through the NeoCITIES 1.0 simulation, which is a simulated task environment of an emergency management team. Findings indicated that training type had a significant impact on performance, such that dyads receiving cross-training had higher levels of performance than those receiving team coordination training. However, this effect did not vary across environmental conditions.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/79953084354

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/79953084354#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1518/107118110X12829370089687

DO - 10.1518/107118110X12829370089687

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:79953084354

SN - 9781617820885

T3 - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

SP - 1640

EP - 1644

BT - 54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010

T2 - 54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010

Y2 - 27 September 2010 through 1 October 2010

ER -

The differential impact of two training strategies on team performance

Abstract

Publication series

Other

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this