TY - JOUR
T1 - The distinctiveness of public sector HRM
T2 - A four-wave trend analysis
AU - Knies, Eva
AU - Borst, Rick T.
AU - Leisink, Peter
AU - Farndale, Elaine
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the efforts of CRANET partners worldwide in collecting the data used in this paper. We would like to thank the reviewers and editor Geoffrey Wood for providing rigorous feedback on previous versions of this manuscript. There is no funding associated with this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Human Resource Management Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Given the rhetoric that human resource management (HRM) models adopted by public and private organisations are becoming more similar, this study questions whether the traditional distinction between public and private sector HRM is still relevant. Building from institutional theory, we study continuity and change using four-wave data from eight European countries. We find that the traditional public sector investment in employee well-being continues to be distinctive only for HRM practices aimed at equal opportunities. Private sector organisations, on the other hand, make greater use of performance-oriented HRM practices including compensation and benefits, performance appraisal data, and modern development and career management practices. Cross-sector convergence is explained through coercive and mimetic isomorphic change, while persistent differences indicate that time-honoured public sector values are less susceptible to change. This study provides a much-needed update of the public-private comparison and a trend analysis of developments over time.
AB - Given the rhetoric that human resource management (HRM) models adopted by public and private organisations are becoming more similar, this study questions whether the traditional distinction between public and private sector HRM is still relevant. Building from institutional theory, we study continuity and change using four-wave data from eight European countries. We find that the traditional public sector investment in employee well-being continues to be distinctive only for HRM practices aimed at equal opportunities. Private sector organisations, on the other hand, make greater use of performance-oriented HRM practices including compensation and benefits, performance appraisal data, and modern development and career management practices. Cross-sector convergence is explained through coercive and mimetic isomorphic change, while persistent differences indicate that time-honoured public sector values are less susceptible to change. This study provides a much-needed update of the public-private comparison and a trend analysis of developments over time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126209881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126209881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1748-8583.12440
DO - 10.1111/1748-8583.12440
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126209881
SN - 0954-5395
VL - 32
SP - 799
EP - 825
JO - Human Resource Management Journal
JF - Human Resource Management Journal
IS - 4
ER -