TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance
AU - Sarlegna, Fabrice R.
AU - Sainburg, Robert L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments We would like to thank Ewelina Styczynska for help in data collection. This research was funded by the National Institute of Health (NICHD Grant R01HD39311).
PY - 2007/1
Y1 - 2007/1
N2 - The goal of this study was to determine whether the sensory nature of a target influences the roles of vision and proprioception in the planning of movement distance. Two groups of subjects made rapid, elbow extension movements, either toward a visual target or toward the index fingertip of the unseen opposite hand. Visual feedback of the reaching index fingertip was only available before movement onset. Using a virtual reality display, we randomly introduced a discrepancy between actual and virtual (cursor) fingertip location. When subjects reached toward the visual target, movement distance varied with changes in visual information about initial hand position. For the proprioceptive target, movement distance varied mostly with changes in proprioceptive information about initial position. The effect of target modality was already present at the time of peak acceleration, indicating that this effect include feedforward processes. Our results suggest that the relative contributions of vision and proprioception to motor planning can change, depending on the modality in which task relevant information is represented.
AB - The goal of this study was to determine whether the sensory nature of a target influences the roles of vision and proprioception in the planning of movement distance. Two groups of subjects made rapid, elbow extension movements, either toward a visual target or toward the index fingertip of the unseen opposite hand. Visual feedback of the reaching index fingertip was only available before movement onset. Using a virtual reality display, we randomly introduced a discrepancy between actual and virtual (cursor) fingertip location. When subjects reached toward the visual target, movement distance varied with changes in visual information about initial hand position. For the proprioceptive target, movement distance varied mostly with changes in proprioceptive information about initial position. The effect of target modality was already present at the time of peak acceleration, indicating that this effect include feedforward processes. Our results suggest that the relative contributions of vision and proprioception to motor planning can change, depending on the modality in which task relevant information is represented.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751530884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751530884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00221-006-0613-5
DO - 10.1007/s00221-006-0613-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 16896981
AN - SCOPUS:33751530884
SN - 0014-4819
VL - 176
SP - 267
EP - 280
JO - Experimental Brain Research
JF - Experimental Brain Research
IS - 2
ER -