TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of educative curriculum materials on teachers' Use of instructional strategies for English language learners in science and on student learning
AU - Cervetti, Gina N.
AU - Kulikowich, Jonna M.
AU - Bravo, Marco A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - This experimental study tests the extent to which specially-designed curriculum materials supported teachers in using instructional strategies for English Language Learners (ELLs) as they implemented an innovative science curriculum for fourth and fifth grade students. Specifically, we examine the impact of a set of educative features-optional notes to the teacher suggesting strategies for use with ELLs-on teachers' (n = 15) use of strategies as they enacted the curriculum, on teachers' ELL pedagogical knowledge, and on ELL's science and vocabulary learning. Comparison teachers taught the same 40-session space science curriculum, but they did not have access to the educative features. We used observations to monitor fidelity to the main curriculum, and to document teachers' use of instructional strategies with ELLs. Treatment teachers who had access to the features used more strategies to support ELLs in their classrooms, used a wider range of strategies and acquired more new strategies than did comparison teachers. While no differences were detected on student (n = 358) science and vocabulary learning between treatment and comparison groups, correlation analysis illustrated close association between teacher strategy use and ELL's learning. The results suggest potential for teacher learning from educative features and positive impact on ELL's learning.
AB - This experimental study tests the extent to which specially-designed curriculum materials supported teachers in using instructional strategies for English Language Learners (ELLs) as they implemented an innovative science curriculum for fourth and fifth grade students. Specifically, we examine the impact of a set of educative features-optional notes to the teacher suggesting strategies for use with ELLs-on teachers' (n = 15) use of strategies as they enacted the curriculum, on teachers' ELL pedagogical knowledge, and on ELL's science and vocabulary learning. Comparison teachers taught the same 40-session space science curriculum, but they did not have access to the educative features. We used observations to monitor fidelity to the main curriculum, and to document teachers' use of instructional strategies with ELLs. Treatment teachers who had access to the features used more strategies to support ELLs in their classrooms, used a wider range of strategies and acquired more new strategies than did comparison teachers. While no differences were detected on student (n = 358) science and vocabulary learning between treatment and comparison groups, correlation analysis illustrated close association between teacher strategy use and ELL's learning. The results suggest potential for teacher learning from educative features and positive impact on ELL's learning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920273918&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920273918&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.005
DO - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84920273918
SN - 0361-476X
VL - 40
SP - 86
EP - 98
JO - Contemporary Educational Psychology
JF - Contemporary Educational Psychology
ER -