TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effects of Wobbling Mass Components on Joint Dynamics During Running
AU - Masters, Samuel E.
AU - Challis, John H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Human Kinetics, Inc.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Soft tissue moves relative to the underlying bone during locomotion. Research has shown that soft tissue motion has an effect on aspects of the dynamics of running; however, little is known about the effects of soft tissue motion on the joint kinetics. In the present study, for a single subject, soft tissue motion was modeled using wobbling components in an inverse dynamics analysis to access the effects of the soft tissue on joint kinetics at the knee and hip. The added wobbling components had little effect on the knee joint kinetics, but large effects on the hip joint kinetics. In particular, the hip joint power and net negative and net positive mechanical work at the hip was greatly underestimated when calculated with the model without wobbling components compared with that of the model with wobbling components. For example, for low-frequency wobbling conditions, the magnitude of the peak hip joint moments were 50% greater when computed accounting the wobbling masses compared with a rigid body model, while for high-frequency wobbling conditions, the peaks were within 15%. The present study suggests that soft tissue motion should not be ignored during inverse dynamics analyses of running.
AB - Soft tissue moves relative to the underlying bone during locomotion. Research has shown that soft tissue motion has an effect on aspects of the dynamics of running; however, little is known about the effects of soft tissue motion on the joint kinetics. In the present study, for a single subject, soft tissue motion was modeled using wobbling components in an inverse dynamics analysis to access the effects of the soft tissue on joint kinetics at the knee and hip. The added wobbling components had little effect on the knee joint kinetics, but large effects on the hip joint kinetics. In particular, the hip joint power and net negative and net positive mechanical work at the hip was greatly underestimated when calculated with the model without wobbling components compared with that of the model with wobbling components. For example, for low-frequency wobbling conditions, the magnitude of the peak hip joint moments were 50% greater when computed accounting the wobbling masses compared with a rigid body model, while for high-frequency wobbling conditions, the peaks were within 15%. The present study suggests that soft tissue motion should not be ignored during inverse dynamics analyses of running.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128493460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128493460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jab.2021-0051
DO - 10.1123/jab.2021-0051
M3 - Article
C2 - 35231882
AN - SCOPUS:85128493460
SN - 1065-8483
VL - 38
SP - 69
EP - 75
JO - Journal of applied biomechanics
JF - Journal of applied biomechanics
IS - 2
ER -