TY - JOUR
T1 - The emergence and framing of farm-to-school initiatives
T2 - Civic engagement, health and local agriculture
AU - Bagdonis, Jessica M.
AU - Hinrichs, C. Clare
AU - Schafft, Kai A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This research was supported by a Health Thematic Initiative grant from the Pennsylvania State University Office for Outreach.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Interest in and initiation of farm-to-school (FTS) programs have increased in recent years, spurred on by converging public concerns about child obesity trends and risks associated with industrialization and distancing in the modern food system. A civic agriculture framework that more specifically considers civic engagement and problem solving offers insights about variations in the development and prospects for FTS programs. Drawing on comparative case studies of two emerging FTS initiatives in Pennsylvania - one in a rural setting and one in an urban setting - this article examines the role of internal and external "champions" in launching FTS programs and fostering civic engagement. Farm-to-school community stakeholders across the two cases framed FTS in broadly similar terms of (1) redressing poor food environments; (2) improving student nutrition, health and well-being; and (3) revitalizing rural community through support of local agriculture. However, specific concerns and emphases differed across the rural and urban cases, illustrating the significance of local context for such programs. The article concludes by discussing the importance of frame bridging and frame extension as strategies for expanding the FTS movement, and also ensuring programs that correspond to the specific circumstances and possibilities of their social and geographic settings.
AB - Interest in and initiation of farm-to-school (FTS) programs have increased in recent years, spurred on by converging public concerns about child obesity trends and risks associated with industrialization and distancing in the modern food system. A civic agriculture framework that more specifically considers civic engagement and problem solving offers insights about variations in the development and prospects for FTS programs. Drawing on comparative case studies of two emerging FTS initiatives in Pennsylvania - one in a rural setting and one in an urban setting - this article examines the role of internal and external "champions" in launching FTS programs and fostering civic engagement. Farm-to-school community stakeholders across the two cases framed FTS in broadly similar terms of (1) redressing poor food environments; (2) improving student nutrition, health and well-being; and (3) revitalizing rural community through support of local agriculture. However, specific concerns and emphases differed across the rural and urban cases, illustrating the significance of local context for such programs. The article concludes by discussing the importance of frame bridging and frame extension as strategies for expanding the FTS movement, and also ensuring programs that correspond to the specific circumstances and possibilities of their social and geographic settings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59649100175&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59649100175&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10460-008-9173-6
DO - 10.1007/s10460-008-9173-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:59649100175
SN - 0889-048X
VL - 26
SP - 107
EP - 119
JO - Agriculture and Human Values
JF - Agriculture and Human Values
IS - 1-2
ER -