TY - JOUR
T1 - The Ethics of Diversity Ideology
T2 - Consequences of Leader Diversity Ideology on Ethical Leadership Perception and Organizational Citizenship Behavior
AU - Dang, Carolyn T.
AU - Volpone, Sabrina D.
AU - Umphress, Elizabeth E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this research was supported by the Pennsylvania State University, University of Colorado Boulder, University of New Mexico, and University of Washington. We thank the Anderson School of Management Behavioral Research Lab for help with data collection. Earlier versions of this work were presented in 2021 at University of Michigan’s Interdisciplinary Committee on Organizational Studies conference, and in 2018 at the Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion conference in Montreal
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Psychological Association
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Scholars have suggested that leader diversity ideologies are imbued with ethical or normative content (e.g., Nkomo & Hoobler, 2014). We advance this literature by examining the ethical consequences of leader diversity ideologies. Specifically, we integrate the ethical leadership framework and the theory of recognition to suggest that leaders who communicate about diversity by acknowledging individuals’ racial/ethnic identities (i.e., use identity-conscious ideology) are deemed by followers as more ethical than leaders who do not (i.e., use identity-blind ideologies). We further suggest that this effect is stronger for followers who are higher in institutional discrimination awareness (defined as those who are more likely to view racial/ethnic identities as consequential within society). Finally, we assert that this interactive effect on ethical leadership will subsequently influence follower engagement in discretionary, proactive behavior directed toward the organization. We found support for our predictions across two experiments and a field study.
AB - Scholars have suggested that leader diversity ideologies are imbued with ethical or normative content (e.g., Nkomo & Hoobler, 2014). We advance this literature by examining the ethical consequences of leader diversity ideologies. Specifically, we integrate the ethical leadership framework and the theory of recognition to suggest that leaders who communicate about diversity by acknowledging individuals’ racial/ethnic identities (i.e., use identity-conscious ideology) are deemed by followers as more ethical than leaders who do not (i.e., use identity-blind ideologies). We further suggest that this effect is stronger for followers who are higher in institutional discrimination awareness (defined as those who are more likely to view racial/ethnic identities as consequential within society). Finally, we assert that this interactive effect on ethical leadership will subsequently influence follower engagement in discretionary, proactive behavior directed toward the organization. We found support for our predictions across two experiments and a field study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130600208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85130600208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/apl0001010
DO - 10.1037/apl0001010
M3 - Article
C2 - 35298214
AN - SCOPUS:85130600208
SN - 0021-9010
JO - Journal of Applied Psychology
JF - Journal of Applied Psychology
ER -