TY - JOUR
T1 - The Evolution of Integrated Assessment
T2 - Developing the Next Generation of Use-Inspired Integrated Assessment Tools
AU - Fisher-Vanden, Karen
AU - Weyant, John
N1 - Funding Information:
There have been numerous efforts to connect certain components of the integrated system shown in Figure 3. However, few if any capture the fully integrated system, although current efforts are underway to do this; for example, a small but growing group of community-building efforts is focused on multiregional, multisectoral dynamics that are not directly motivated by climate change concerns, but more narrowly on extreme weather events and their joint impacts integrating energy, water, land use, and agricultural systems. A significant programmatic effort in that domain has been sponsored over the last five years by the MultiSector Dynamics program within the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the Department of Energy’s Office of Science (US DOE 2020). This program has sponsored four interdisciplinary, multi-institution, US-focused projects: The Integrated Multisector Multiscale Modeling (http://im3.pnnl.gov) project led by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, the Program on Coupled Human and Earth Systems (https://www.pches.psu.edu) at Pennsylvania State University and Stanford University, the Integrating Human and Earth Dynamics project led by the Joint Global Change Research Institute (http://globalchange.umd.edu), and the MSD program led by the Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change at MIT (https://globalchange.mit.edu/research/research-projects/an-integrated-framework-for-modeling-multi-system-dynamics).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved
PY - 2020/10/6
Y1 - 2020/10/6
N2 - In this review, we attempt to describe the evolution of integrated assessment modeling research since the pioneering work of William Nordhaus in 1994, highlighting a number of challenges and suggestions for moving the field forward. The field has evolved from global aggregate models focused on cost-benefit analysis to detailed process models used to generate emissions scenarios and to coupled model frameworks for impact analyses. The increased demand for higher sectoral, temporal, and spatial resolution to conduct impact analyses has led to a number of challenges both computationally and conceptually. Overcoming these challenges and moving the field forward will require not only greater efforts in model coupling software and translational tools, the incorporation of empirical findings into integrated assessment models, and intermethod comparisons but also the expansion and better coordination of multidisciplinary researchers in this field through better training of the next generation of integrated assessment scholars and expanding the community of practice.
AB - In this review, we attempt to describe the evolution of integrated assessment modeling research since the pioneering work of William Nordhaus in 1994, highlighting a number of challenges and suggestions for moving the field forward. The field has evolved from global aggregate models focused on cost-benefit analysis to detailed process models used to generate emissions scenarios and to coupled model frameworks for impact analyses. The increased demand for higher sectoral, temporal, and spatial resolution to conduct impact analyses has led to a number of challenges both computationally and conceptually. Overcoming these challenges and moving the field forward will require not only greater efforts in model coupling software and translational tools, the incorporation of empirical findings into integrated assessment models, and intermethod comparisons but also the expansion and better coordination of multidisciplinary researchers in this field through better training of the next generation of integrated assessment scholars and expanding the community of practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092700945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092700945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-030314
DO - 10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-030314
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85092700945
SN - 1941-1340
VL - 12
SP - 471
EP - 487
JO - Annual Review of Resource Economics
JF - Annual Review of Resource Economics
ER -