The gardens revisited: The link between technology, meaning and logic?

Gabriela Celani, José P. Duarte, Carlos V. Vaz

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to compare the computational concepts present in three books published by Mitchell between 1987 and 1990: The art of computer-graphics programming (1987), which has Robin Liggett and Thomas Kvan as co-authors, The logic of architecture (1990), probably his most influential work, and The poetics of gardens (1988), which has Charles Moore and William Turnbull as coauthors. By looking at the concepts that are presented in the three books and establishing a comparison between them, we expect to show that The poetics of Gardens should not be seen as a detour from Mitchell's line of research, but rather as a key piece for understanding the relationship between technology, meaning and logic in his very coherent body of work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCircuit Bending, Breaking and Mending - Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA 2011
Pages643-652
Number of pages10
StatePublished - 2011
Event16th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA 2011 - Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Duration: Apr 27 2011Apr 29 2011

Publication series

NameCircuit Bending, Breaking and Mending - Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA 2011

Other

Other16th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA 2011
Country/TerritoryAustralia
CityNewcastle, NSW
Period4/27/114/29/11

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Building and Construction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The gardens revisited: The link between technology, meaning and logic?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this