The genealogy detectives: A constitutional analysis of "familial searching"

David H. Kaye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations


"Familial searching" in law enforcement DNA databases has been pilloried as a step "towards eugenics and corruption of blood" and "lifelong genetic surveillance" that is "inconsistent with a basic pillar of American political thought." Courts have yet to address the issue fully, but several commentators contend the practice is unwise, unjust, or unconstitutional. This Article examines the more significant constitutional claims. It concludes that although kinship matching should not be implemented simply because it is technologically seductive, neither should it be removed from the realm of permissible law enforcement information gathering on constitutional grounds. In reaching this conclusion, the Article describes the logic of kinship analysis; clarifies the nature of partial-match searching; shows how an advanced system of DNA databases could yield additional, accurate leads in the investigation of both routine and high profile crimes; and explains why this system, if properly implemented, is compatible with constitutionally protected interests of both convicted offenders and their close relatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-163
Number of pages55
JournalAmerican Criminal Law Review
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'The genealogy detectives: A constitutional analysis of "familial searching"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this