TY - JOUR
T1 - The identification and validation process of proportional reasoning attributes
T2 - An application of a cognitive diagnosis modeling framework
AU - Tjoe, Hartono
AU - de la Torre, Jimmy
PY - 2014/6
Y1 - 2014/6
N2 - In this paper, we discuss the process of identifying and validating students' abilities to think proportionally. More specifically, we describe the methodology we used to identify these proportional reasoning attributes, beginning with the selection and review of relevant literature on proportional reasoning. We then continue with the deliberation and resolution of differing views by mathematics researchers, mathematics educators, and middle school mathematics teachers of what should be learned theoretically and what can be taught practically in everyday classroom settings. We also present the initial development of proportional reasoning items as part of the two-phase validation process of the previously identified attributes. In particular, we detail in the first phase of the validation process our collaboration with middle school mathematics teachers in the creation of prototype items and the verification of each item-attribute specification in consideration of the most common ways (among many different ways) in which middle school students would have solved these prototype items themselves. In the second phase of the validation process, we elaborate our think-aloud interview procedure in the search for evidence of whether students generally solved the prototype items in the way they were expected to.
AB - In this paper, we discuss the process of identifying and validating students' abilities to think proportionally. More specifically, we describe the methodology we used to identify these proportional reasoning attributes, beginning with the selection and review of relevant literature on proportional reasoning. We then continue with the deliberation and resolution of differing views by mathematics researchers, mathematics educators, and middle school mathematics teachers of what should be learned theoretically and what can be taught practically in everyday classroom settings. We also present the initial development of proportional reasoning items as part of the two-phase validation process of the previously identified attributes. In particular, we detail in the first phase of the validation process our collaboration with middle school mathematics teachers in the creation of prototype items and the verification of each item-attribute specification in consideration of the most common ways (among many different ways) in which middle school students would have solved these prototype items themselves. In the second phase of the validation process, we elaborate our think-aloud interview procedure in the search for evidence of whether students generally solved the prototype items in the way they were expected to.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901605633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901605633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13394-013-0090-7
DO - 10.1007/s13394-013-0090-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84901605633
SN - 1033-2170
VL - 26
SP - 237
EP - 255
JO - Mathematics Education Research Journal
JF - Mathematics Education Research Journal
IS - 2
ER -