Abstract
We examine the impact of four policy options on consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) by estimating a random-coefficient discrete-choice model of demand. Policy simulations using demand estimates indicate that the impacts of banning television advertising, limiting container size, and limiting calories on total consumption would be similar-an estimated 15.40-15.75 percent reduction. However, limiting calories would have a significantly greater impact on consumption of regular CSDs (-28.89 percent) and on calories consumed from CSDs (-19.34 percent). A tax on calories was least effective in curtailing overall consumption and consumption of regular CSDs.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 53-68 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Agricultural and Resource Economics Review |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2014 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Agronomy and Crop Science
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of four alternative policies to decrease soda consumption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver