Abstract
Supervisors, managers, and executives (N = 118) comprised the sample for this field study of persons' labeling of sexual harassment and endorsement of various remedies for sexual harassment. The research method involved questionnaires issued in conjunction with 2 videotaped sexual harassment scenarios of differing severity. Results support predictions of participants' ability to distinguish harassment severity, the effect of job level, and prior training's effect. Implications for qualifying the concept of work environment sexualization (Gutek, 1985) with consideration of job levels are discussed. Implications for sexual harassment awareness training and management practice are also discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1605-1623 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Social Psychology |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1999 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of job level and prior training on sexual harassment labeling and remedy choice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver