TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of new cathode materials relative to baseline performance of microbial fuel cells all with the same architecture and solution chemistry
AU - Yang, Wulin
AU - Kim, Kyoung Yeol
AU - Saikaly, Pascal E.
AU - Logan, Bruce E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Differences in microbial fuel cell (MFC) architectures, materials, and solution chemistries, have previously hindered direct comparisons of improvements in power production due to new cathode materials. However, one common reactor design has now been used in many different laboratories around the world under similar operating conditions based on using: a graphite fiber brush anode, a platinum cathode catalyst, a single-chamber cube-shaped (4 cm) MFC with a 3 cm diameter anolyte chamber, 50 mM phosphate buffer, and an acetate fuel. Analysis of several publications over 10 years from a single laboratory showed that even under such identical operational conditions, maximum power densities varied by 15%, with an average of 1.36 ± 0.20 W m-2 (n = 24), normalized to cathode projected area (34 W m-3 liquid volume). In other laboratories, maximum power was significantly less, with an average of 0.91 ± 0.26 W m-2 (n = 10), despite identical conditions. One likely reason for the differences in power is cathode age. Power production with Pt catalyst cathodes significantly declined after one month of operation or more to 0.87 ± 0.31 W m-2 (n = 18) based on studies where cathode aging was examined, while in many studies the age of the cathode was not reported. Using these studies as a performance baseline, we review the claims of improvements in power generation due to new anode or cathode materials, or changes in solution conductivities and substrates.
AB - Differences in microbial fuel cell (MFC) architectures, materials, and solution chemistries, have previously hindered direct comparisons of improvements in power production due to new cathode materials. However, one common reactor design has now been used in many different laboratories around the world under similar operating conditions based on using: a graphite fiber brush anode, a platinum cathode catalyst, a single-chamber cube-shaped (4 cm) MFC with a 3 cm diameter anolyte chamber, 50 mM phosphate buffer, and an acetate fuel. Analysis of several publications over 10 years from a single laboratory showed that even under such identical operational conditions, maximum power densities varied by 15%, with an average of 1.36 ± 0.20 W m-2 (n = 24), normalized to cathode projected area (34 W m-3 liquid volume). In other laboratories, maximum power was significantly less, with an average of 0.91 ± 0.26 W m-2 (n = 10), despite identical conditions. One likely reason for the differences in power is cathode age. Power production with Pt catalyst cathodes significantly declined after one month of operation or more to 0.87 ± 0.31 W m-2 (n = 18) based on studies where cathode aging was examined, while in many studies the age of the cathode was not reported. Using these studies as a performance baseline, we review the claims of improvements in power generation due to new anode or cathode materials, or changes in solution conductivities and substrates.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024104894&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024104894&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/c7ee00910k
DO - 10.1039/c7ee00910k
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85024104894
SN - 1754-5692
VL - 10
SP - 1025
EP - 1033
JO - Energy and Environmental Science
JF - Energy and Environmental Science
IS - 5
ER -