TY - JOUR
T1 - The Impact of Surgical Ventricular Restoration on Mitral Valve Regurgitation
AU - Prucz, Roni B.
AU - Weiss, Eric S.
AU - Patel, Nishant D.
AU - Nwakanma, Lois U.
AU - Shah, Ashish S.
AU - Conte, John V.
N1 - Funding Information:
Mr Prucz has received research support from the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Dean's Office and the American Federation for Aging Research. Dr Weiss is an Irene Piccinini Investigator in Cardiac Surgery. Mr Patel is the 2005 Chase Medical Scholar for Surgical Ventricular Restoration. Dr Nwakanma is a Hugh R. Sharp Cardiac Surgery Research Fellow. Dr Conte has received research support from Chase Medical Corporation.
PY - 2008/9
Y1 - 2008/9
N2 - Background: Surgical management of functional mitral regurgitation (MR) in ischemic cardiomyopathy is controversial. Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) decreases left ventricular volume and may improve MR severity. We assessed the impact of SVR on the degree of MR. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with ejection fractions (EF) < 0.35 who underwent SVR with coronary artery bypass grafting (SVR+CABG) over a 3-year period. Patients with concomitant mitral valve procedures were excluded. Patients with EF < 0.35 who had CABG alone during the same time period served as control. Mitral regurgitation was graded 0 to 4+ by echocardiogram and ventriculogram. Outcomes included survival, MR grade, and cardiac function. Results: Thirty-nine patients received SVR+CABG: 3% (1 of 39) had 4+, 10% (4 of 39) had 3+, 51% (20 of 39) had 2+, and 36% (14 of 39) had 0 to 1+ MR. Thirty-five patients with a similar MR distribution underwent CABG alone. Operative mortality was 2.6% for SVR+CABG and 5.7% for CABG patients (p = 0.62). At follow-up, MR grade decreased by 57% (2.24 ± 0.5 to 1.24 ± 0.9, p < 0.001) for the SVR+CABG group compared to 12% (2.25 ± 0.5 to 2.00 ± 0.9, p = 0.27) for the CABG alone group. SVR+CABG patients had significantly less MR than CABG patients at follow-up (1.24 ± 0.9 vs 2.00 ± 0.9, p = 0.007), with 15 patients improving to 0 to 1+ MR postoperatively versus 6 patients in the CABG cohort (p = 0.02). Improvement in postoperative EF was significantly greater after SVR+CABG (0.13% vs 7%, p = 0.04). Three-year survival was 85% for SVR+CABG and 72% for CABG patients (p = 0.39). Conclusions: SVR+CABG demonstrated greater reduction in MR severity at follow-up than CABG alone. Decreased left ventricular volumes and improved papillary muscle orientation likely contribute to decreased MR after SVR.
AB - Background: Surgical management of functional mitral regurgitation (MR) in ischemic cardiomyopathy is controversial. Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) decreases left ventricular volume and may improve MR severity. We assessed the impact of SVR on the degree of MR. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with ejection fractions (EF) < 0.35 who underwent SVR with coronary artery bypass grafting (SVR+CABG) over a 3-year period. Patients with concomitant mitral valve procedures were excluded. Patients with EF < 0.35 who had CABG alone during the same time period served as control. Mitral regurgitation was graded 0 to 4+ by echocardiogram and ventriculogram. Outcomes included survival, MR grade, and cardiac function. Results: Thirty-nine patients received SVR+CABG: 3% (1 of 39) had 4+, 10% (4 of 39) had 3+, 51% (20 of 39) had 2+, and 36% (14 of 39) had 0 to 1+ MR. Thirty-five patients with a similar MR distribution underwent CABG alone. Operative mortality was 2.6% for SVR+CABG and 5.7% for CABG patients (p = 0.62). At follow-up, MR grade decreased by 57% (2.24 ± 0.5 to 1.24 ± 0.9, p < 0.001) for the SVR+CABG group compared to 12% (2.25 ± 0.5 to 2.00 ± 0.9, p = 0.27) for the CABG alone group. SVR+CABG patients had significantly less MR than CABG patients at follow-up (1.24 ± 0.9 vs 2.00 ± 0.9, p = 0.007), with 15 patients improving to 0 to 1+ MR postoperatively versus 6 patients in the CABG cohort (p = 0.02). Improvement in postoperative EF was significantly greater after SVR+CABG (0.13% vs 7%, p = 0.04). Three-year survival was 85% for SVR+CABG and 72% for CABG patients (p = 0.39). Conclusions: SVR+CABG demonstrated greater reduction in MR severity at follow-up than CABG alone. Decreased left ventricular volumes and improved papillary muscle orientation likely contribute to decreased MR after SVR.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49549087990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49549087990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.100
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.100
M3 - Article
C2 - 18721553
AN - SCOPUS:49549087990
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 86
SP - 726
EP - 734
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 3
ER -